Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Vision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Umar Muhammad BelloiD, Jing WangiD, Adela S. Y. ParkiD, Ken W. S. TaniD, Blossom W. S. Cheung, Benjamin S. ThompsoniD, Allen M. Y. CheongiD
Abstract
ObjectiveMultiple studies have explored the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance visual function. These studies vary in sample size, outcome measures, and NIBS methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the effects of NIBS on visual functions in human participants with normal vision. MethodsWe followed the PRISMA guidelines, and a review protocol was registered with PROSPERO before study commencement (CRD42021255882). We searched Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, PubMed, OpenGrey and Web of Science using relevant keywords. The search covered the period from 1st January 2000 until 1st September 2021. Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software was used for quantitative analysis. ResultsForty-nine studies were included, of which 19 were included in a meta-analysis (38.8%). Meta-analysis indicated acute (Hedgess g=0.232, 95% CI: 0.023-0.442, p=0.029) and aftereffects (0.590, 95% CI: 0.182-0.998, p=0.005) of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES, including three different stimulation protocols) on contrast sensitivity. Visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes were significantly enhanced immediately after tES (0.383, 95% CI: 0.110-0.665, p=0.006). Both tES (0.563, 95% CI: 0.230 to 0.896, p=0.001)] and anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) alone (0.655, 95% CI: 0.273 to 1.038, p=0.001) reduced crowding in peripheral vision. The effects of NIBS on visual acuity, motion perception and reaction time were not statistically significant. ConclusionsThere are significant effects of visual cortex NIBS on contrast sensitivity, VEP amplitude, an index of cortical excitability, and crowding among normally sighted individuals. Future studies with robust experimental designs are needed to substantiate these findings in populations with vision loss. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021255882 HighlightsO_LIWe conducted a meta-analysis and a systematic review on the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for improving on visual function C_LIO_LIVisual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation can enhance contrast sensitivity, reduce crowding in peripheral vision and enhance visually evoked potential amplitude among normally sighted individuals. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on visual perspective taking: A meta-analytic study
Yuan‐Wei Yao, Vivien Chopurian, … Hauke R. Heekeren·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2021
- Improving peripheral reading with non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation of early visual areas
Andrew Silva, Melanie A. Mungalsingh, … Benjamin Thompson·Translational Vision Science & TechnologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2025
- Transcranial electrical stimulation for memory enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Yujin Goto, Ryoji Onagawa, … Koichi Hosomi·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2025
- Transcranial random noise stimulation of the primary visual cortex but not retina modulates visual contrast sensitivity.
Weronika Potok, Alain Post, … Nicole Wenderoth·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023
- Enhancing visual perceptual learning using transcranial electrical stimulation: transcranial alternating current stimulation outperforms both transcranial direct current and random noise stimulation
Qing He, Xinyi Zhu, Fang Fang·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2023
- Boosting learning efficacy with non-invasive brain stimulation in intact and brain-damaged humans
Florian Herpich, Michael D. Melnick, … Lorella Battelli·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 27, 2019