Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on visual perspective taking: A meta-analytic study

Yuan‐Wei YaoiD, Vivien ChopurianiD, Lei ZhangiD, Claus LammiD, Hauke R. HeekereniD

Abstract

Visual perspective taking (VPT) is a critical ability required by complex social interaction. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been increasingly used to examine the causal relationship between brain activity and VPT, yet with heterogeneous results. In the current study, we conducted two meta-analyses to examine the effects of NIBS of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) or dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) on VPT, respectively. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify qualified studies, and computed the standardized effect size (ES) for each combination of VPT level (Level-1: visibility judgment; Level-2: mental rotation) and perspective (self and other). Thirteen studies (rTPJ: 12 studies, 23 ESs; dmPFC: 4 studies, 14 ESs) were included in the meta-analyses. Random-effects models were used to generate the overall effects. Subgroup analyses for distinct VPT conditions were also performed. We found that rTPJ stimulation significantly improved participants visibility judgment from the allocentric perspective, whereas its effects on other VPT conditions are negligible. Stimulation of dmPFC appeared to influence Level-1 performance from the egocentric perspective, although it was only based on a small number of studies. Notably, contrary to some theoretical models, we did not find strong evidence that these regions are involved in Level-2 VPT with a higher requirement of mental rotation. These findings not only advanced our understanding of the causal roles of the rTPJ and dmPFC in VPT, but also revealed the efficacy of NIBS on VPT is relatively small. Researchers should also be cautious about the potential publication bias and selective reporting.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
9
FWCI
0.12
Field percentile
13th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBello '22Martin '20Ogawa '22Eliášová '26Luzio '26Bor '17
72% semantic matchNeuroscience
Umar Muhammad Bello, Jing Wang, Adela S. Y. Park+4 more·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2022