PsychophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Training interoceptive awareness with real-time haptic vs. visual heartbeat feedback
Olga R. DobrushinaiD, Yossi Tamim, Iddo Yehoshua WaldiD, Amber MaimoniD, Amir AmediiD
Abstract
The perception of signals from within the body, known as interoception, is increasingly recognized as a prerequisite for physical and mental health. The study is dedicated to the development of effective technological approaches for enhancing interoceptive awareness. We provide evidence of the effectiveness and practical feasibility of a novel real-time haptic heartbeat supplementation technology combining principles of biofeedback and sensory enhancement. In a randomized controlled study, we applied the developed naturalistic haptic feedback on a group of 30 adults, while another group of 30 adults received more traditional real-time visual heartbeat feedback. A single session of haptic, but not visual heartbeat feedback resulted in increased interoceptive accuracy and confidence, as measured by the heart rate discrimination task, and in a shift of attention towards the body. Participants rated the developed technology as more helpful and pleasant than the visual feedback, thus indicating high user satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of matching sensory characteristics of the feedback to the natural bodily prototype. Our work suggests that real-time haptic feedback might be a superior approach to strengthen mind-body interaction in interventions for physical and mental health. HighlightsO_LIWe developed a naturalistic real-time haptic feedback system for enhancing cardiac interoception. C_LIO_LIThe intervention resulted in higher interoceptive accuracy and confidence, and in a shift of attention towards the body. C_LIO_LIHaptic feedback outperformed traditional visual feedback in efficacy and user satisfaction. C_LIO_LIResults of the study indicate the importance of feedback sensory characteristics in mind-body technologies. C_LI
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reduction of auditory input improves performance on the heartbeat tracking task, but does not necessarily enhance interoception
Jennifer Todd, Farah Hina, Jane Elizabeth Aspell·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2020
- Heart-Brain Interactions Shape Somatosensory Perception and Evoked Potentials
Esra Al, Fivos Iliopoulos, … Arno Villringer·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2020
- Interoception vs. Exteroception: Cardiac interoception competes with tactile perception, yet also facilitates self-relevance encoding
Marie Loescher, Patrick Haggard, Catherine Tallon‐Baudry·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2025
- Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things: illusory perception of heartbeat is induced by pain expectation.
Eleonora Parrotta, Patric Bach, … Francesca Ferri·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2024
- The heart rate discrimination task: a psychophysical method to estimate the accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs
Nicolas Legrand, Niia Emilova Nikolova, … Micah Allen·Biological PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2021
- Heartbeat and Somatosensory Perception
Esra Al, Fivos Iliopoulos, … Arno Villringer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2021