Simple fence modification increases floodplain land movement prospects for freshwater turtles
Abstract
Feral pigs predate on freshwater turtles and damage wetland habitats in the process. Installing fences successfully averts access and damage, however, they become a barrier for freshwater turtles requiring land access during migration. We collected 161 turtles (Chelodina rugosa, Emydura subglobosa worrelli, Myuchelys latisternum) from twenty floodplain and riverine wetlands during post-wet (June-August) and late-dry season (November-December) surveys (2015-2018) in northern Australia. Wetlands were either fenced (150 x 150mm square, 1.05m high wire mesh) or not around the wet perimeter. Nine-seven percent of individuals caught in either fenced or unfenced wetlands had a shell carapace width greater than mesh width, of these 44 (46%) were captured inside fenced wetlands, while 50 were caught in unfenced wetlands. The remaining 35 were smaller than 150mm and would easily pass through fence mesh. Sixty-five turtles partook in a fencing manipulative experiment. Turtles with carapace widths wider than mesh often successfully escaped through fences by lifting one side of their shell and passing diagonally. In a second experiment where a piece of vertical wire (1500mmx300mm) was removed, turtles located gates after prospecting and trying to fit through meshing areas that were too small to pass through. Nine-two percent of turtles were able to locate and pass through gates, while 8% failed to locate a gate after 2 hours. Three turtles that did not use gates, and seemed to give up and dug into the grass. Gates applied every 4m showed an 83% passage rate, every 2m was 91%, and while every 1m was 100%. Combing field and manipulative experiments revealed that large turtles will prospect and move along a fence until they find suitable passage. Applying turtle gates every 1-4m allows almost 100% passage, and if strategically applied in travel corridors, would minimize the need for large-scale clipping efforts around entire wetlands.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Feral pig exclusion fencing provides limited fish conservation value on tropical floodplains
N. Waltham, J. Schaffer·bioRxiv·May 1, 2019
- Effectiveness and efficiency of temporary fences as mitigation measures for preventing amphibians roadkill
Meven Le Brishoual, Clara Tanvier, … Jonathan Jumeau·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- What is the cost of that fence? The impact of fences on the movements of ungulates in a hyper-arid landscape
Morgan Hauptfleisch, Stefanie Urban, … Kenneth Uiseb·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2026
- Impacts of dams on freshwater turtles: a global review to identify conservation solutions
A. Barcenas-Garcia, F. Michalski, … D. Norris·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2021
- Utilising the boundary layer to help restore the connectivity of fish habitats and populations
J. R. Watson, H. R. Goodrich, … C. E. Franklin·bioRxiv·May 28, 2018
- Carnivores cross irrigation canals more often through overpasses than through culverts