Common framework for virtual lesion and state-dependent TMS: the facilitatory/suppressive range model of online TMS effects on behavior
Abstract
The behavioral effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) are often nonlinear; factors such as stimulation intensity and brain state can modulate the impact of TMS on observable behavior in qualitatively different manner. Here we propose a theoretical framework to account for these effects. In this model, there are distinct intensity ranges for facilitatory and suppressive effects of TMS: low intensities facilitate neural activity and behavior whereas high intensities induce suppression. The key feature of the model is that these ranges are shifted by changes in neural excitability: consequently, a TMS intensity, which normally induces suppression, can have a facilitatory effect if the stimulated neurons are being inhibited. For example, adaptation reduces excitability of adapted neurons; the outcome is that TMS intensities which inhibit non-adapted neurons induce a facilitation on adapted neural representations, leading to reversal of adaptation effects. In conventional virtual lesion paradigms, similar effects occur because neurons not tuned to the target stimulus are inhibited. The resulting reduction in excitability can turn high intensity inhibitory TMS to low intensity facilitatory TMS for these neurons (whereas neurons tuned to the target stimulus are inhibited), leading to a reduction in signal-to-noise ratio. Thus differential excitability levels of neural populations contributing to behavior, combined with nonlinear neural effects, can explain how TMS modulates behavior.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 117
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): How brain state and baseline performance level determine behavioral effects of TMS
Juha Silvanto, Silvia Bona, … Zaira Cattaneo·Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2018
- Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons
A. Aberra, B. Wang, … A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2018
- Biophysical modeling of neural plasticity induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Marcus Thomas Wilson, Ben Fulcher, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Clinical NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2018
- Modeling motor-evoked potentials from neural field simulations of transcranial magnetic stimulation
M. T. Wilson, B. Moezzi, N. C. Rogasch·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2020
- TMS alters multivoxel patterns in the absence of overall activity changes
Farshad Rafiei, Martin Safrin, … Dobromir Rahnev·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020
- In vivo low-intensity magnetic pulses durably alter neocortical neuron excitability and spontaneous activity.
Manon Boyer, Paul Baudin, … Séverine Mahon·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 28, 2022