Training a spiking neuronal network model of visual-motor cortex to play a virtual racket-ball game using reinforcement learning
Haroon AnwariD, Simon CabyiD, Salvador Durá-BernaliD, David D’OnofrioiD, Daniel HaşeganiD, Matt DeibleiD, Sara Grunblatt, George L. ChadderdoniD, Cliff C. KerriD, Péter LakatosiD, William W. LyttoniD, Hananel HazaniD, Samuel A. NeymotiniD
Abstract
Recent models of spiking neuronal networks have been trained to perform behaviors in static environments using a variety of learning rules, with varying degrees of biological realism. Most of these models have not been tested in dynamic visual environments where models must make predictions on future states and adjust their behavior accordingly. The models using these learning rules are often treated as black boxes, with little analysis on circuit architectures and learning mechanisms supporting optimal performance. Here we developed visual/motor spiking neuronal network models and trained them to play a virtual racket-ball game using several reinforcement learning algorithms inspired by the dopaminergic reward system. We systematically investigated how different architectures and circuit-motifs (feed-forward, recurrent, feedback) contributed to learning and performance. We also developed a new biologically-inspired learning rule that significantly enhanced performance, while reducing training time. Our models included visual areas encoding game inputs and relaying the information to motor areas, which used this information to learn to move the racket to hit the ball. Neurons in the early visual area relayed information encoding object location and motion direction across the network. Neuronal association areas encoded spatial relationships between objects in the visual scene. Motor populations received inputs from visual and association areas representing the dorsal pathway. Two populations of motor neurons generated commands to move the racket up or down. Model-generated actions updated the environment and triggered reward or punishment signals that adjusted synaptic weights so that the models could learn which actions led to reward. Here we demonstrate that our biologically-plausible learning rules were effective in training spiking neuronal network models to solve problems in dynamic environments. We used our models to dissect the circuit architectures and learning rules most effective for learning. Our model shows that learning mechanisms involving different neural circuits produce similar performance in sensory-motor tasks. In biological networks, all learning mechanisms may complement one another, accelerating the learning capabilities of animals. Furthermore, this also highlights the resilience and redundancy in biological systems.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Field percentile
- top 24%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks for Continuous Motor Control: A Biologically Plausible Model of Motor Cortex
Hiroto Imamura, Fumio Imamura, … Riichiro Hira·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2026
- Brain-like neural dynamics for behavioral control develop through reinforcement learning
Olivier Codol, Nanda H. Krishna, … Matthew G. Perich·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2024
- Learning recurrent dynamics in spiking networks
Christopher M. Kim, Carson C. Chow·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2018
- Constraints for spatially and temporally precise learning in a neural circuit model of reinforcement learning
Yiheng Wang, Joergen M. R. Kornfeld, … Mark S. Goldman·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- Temporal stimulus segmentation by reinforcement learning in populations of spiking neurons
Luisa Le Donne, Lik Chun Chan, … Giancarlo La Camera·Physical review. EPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Simple Framework for Constructing Functional Spiking Recurrent Neural Networks
Robert Kim, Yinghao Li, Terrence J. Sejnowski A B·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2019