henhaobio
Sign in

NeuroinformaticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

AnNoBrainer, an Automated Annotation of Mouse Brain Images using Deep Learning

Roman PeteriD, Petr Hrobař, Josef Navratil, Martin Vagenknecht, Jindřich Soukup, Keiko Tsuji, Nestor X. Barrezueta, Anna C. StolliD, Renee C. Gentzel, Jonathan A. SugamiD, Jacob Marcus, Danny A. BittoniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Annotation of multiple regions of interest across the whole mouse brain is an indispensable process for quantitative evaluation of a multitude of study endpoints in neuroscience digital pathology. Prior experience and domain expert knowledge are the key aspects for image annotation quality and consistency. At present, image annotation is often achieved manually by certified pathologists or trained technicians, limiting the total throughput of studies performed at neuroscience digital pathology labs. It may also mean that less rigorous, less time-consuming methods of histopathological assessment are employed by non-pathologists, especially for early discovery and preclinical studies. To address these limitations and to meet the growing demand for image analysis in a pharmaceutical setting, we developed AnNoBrainer, an open-source software tool that leverages deep learning, image registration, and standard cortical brain templates to automatically annotate individual brain regions on 2D pathology slides. Application of AnNoBrainer to a published set of pathology slides from transgenic mice models of synucleinopathy revealed comparable accuracy, increased reproducibility, and a significant reduction ([~]50%) in time spent on brain annotation, quality control and labelling compared to trained scientists in pathology. Taken together, AnNoBrainer offers a rapid, accurate, and reproducible automated annotation of mouse brain images that largely meets the experts histopathological assessment standards (>85% of cases) and enables high-throughput image analysis workflows in digital pathology labs.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
9th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCarey '23Qian '24Tappan '19Mahmood '24Schrimpf '20Rao '26
68% semantic matchNeuroscience
Harry Carey, Michael Pegios, Lewis Martin+7 more·Nature Communications·Sep 21, 2023· 62 citations