Otoacoustic emissions but not behavioral measurements predict cochlear-nerve frequency tuning in an avian vocal-communication specialist
Diana M KarosasiD, Leslie GonzalesiD, Yingxuan WangiD, Christopher BergeviniD, Laurel H. CarneyiD, Kenneth S. HenryiD
Abstract
Frequency analysis by the cochlea forms a key foundation for all subsequent auditory processing. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are a potentially powerful alternative to traditional behavioral experiments for estimating cochlear tuning without invasive testing, as is necessary in humans. Which methods accurately predict cochlear tuning remains controversial due to only a single animal study comparing SFOAE-based, behavioral, and cochlear frequency tuning in the same species. The budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) is a parakeet species with human-like behavioral sensitivity to many sounds and the capacity to mimic speech. Intriguingly, previous studies of critical bands, psychophysical tuning curves, and critical ratios in budgerigars show that behavioral tuning sharpness increases dramatically with increasing frequency from 1-3.5 kHz, doubling once per octave with peak tuning sharpness from 3.5-4 kHz. The pattern contrasts with slower monotonic growth of behavioral tuning sharpness with increasing frequency in other animals, including most avian species, suggesting a possible auditory specialization in budgerigars. We measured SFOAE-based and cochlear-afferent tuning in budgerigars, for comparison to previously reported behavioral results. SFOAE-based and cochlear-afferent tuning sharpness both increased monotonically and relatively slowly for higher frequencies, in contrast to the behavioral pattern. SFOAE-based tuning in budgerigars accurately predicted cochlear frequency tuning, and both measures aligned with typical patterns of cochlear tuning in other species. Divergent behavioral tuning in budgerigars is unlikely attributable to the periphery and could reflect specializations for central processing of masked signals. Our findings highlight the value of SFOAEs for estimating cochlear tuning and caution against direct inference of peripheral tuning from behavioral critical bands, psychophysical tuning curves, and critical ratios.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mechanisms of masking by Schroeder-phase harmonic tone complexes in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)
Kenneth S. Henry, Yingxuan Wang, … Laurel H. Carney·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2022
- Pitch perception is adapted to species-specific cochlear filtering
Kerry M. M. Walker, Ray Gonzalez, … Andrew J. King·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2018
- Exploring rhythmic and melodic preferences in budgerigars: Individual and possible sex-related variation
Masumi Wakita·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Optimal tuning not required: Birds communicate effectively with mismatched auditory filters.
Matías I. Muñoz, Wouter H. Halfwerk·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2025
- Biomechanics of the peafowl’s crest reveals frequencies tuned to social displays
S. A. Kane, D. Van Beveren, R. Dakin·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2018
- Spontaneous otocoherence of the active ear
Seth N.S. Peacock, Václav Vencovský, … Christopher Bergevin·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2025