Significantly distinct branches of hierarchical trees: A framework for statistical analysis and applications to biological data
Abstract
BackgroundOne of the most common goals of hierarchical clustering is finding those branches of a tree that form quantifiably distinct data subtypes. Achieving this goal in a statistically meaningful way requires (a) a measure of distinctness of a branch and (b) a test to determine the significance of the observed measure, applicable to all branches and across multiple scales of dissimilarity.\n\nResultsWe formulate a method termed Tree Branches Evaluated Statistically for Tightness (TBEST) for identifying significantly distinct tree branches in hierarchical clusters. For each branch of the tree a measure of distinctness, or tightness, is defined as a rational function of heights, both of the branch and of its parent. A statistical procedure is then developed to determine the significance of the observed values of tightness. We test TBEST as a tool for tree-based data partitioning by applying it to five benchmark datasets, one of them synthetic and the other four each from a different area of biology. For each dataset there is a well-defined partition of the data into classes. In all test cases TBEST performs on par with or better than the existing techniques.\n\nConclusionsBased on our benchmark analysis, TBEST is a tool of choice for detection of significantly distinct branches in hierarchical trees grown from biological data. An R language implementation of the method is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TBEST/index.html.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing for Dependence on Tree Structures
Merle Behr, M. Azim Ansari, … Chris C. Holmes·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2020
- Comparing phylogenetic trees according to tip label categories
Michelle Kendall, Vegard Eldholm, Caroline Colijn·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2018
- TreeCluster: clustering biological sequences using phylogenetic trees
Metin Balaban, Niema Moshiri, … Siavash Mirarab·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2019
- Phylogenetic tree statistics: a systematic overview using the new R package 'treestats'
Thijs Janzen, Rampal S. Etienne·Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2024
- PhytClust: Efficient and Optimal Monophyletic Partitioning of Rooted Phylogenetic Trees
Katyayni Ganesan, Elisa Billard, … Roland F. Schwarz·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2026
- treeclimbR pinpoints the data-dependent resolution of hierarchical hypotheses
Ruizhu Huang, Charlotte Soneson, … Mark D. Robinson·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2021