Light spectra trigger divergent gene expression in barley cultivars
A. Monteagudo, A. Rodriguez del Rio, B. Contreras-Moreira, T. Kiss, M. Mayer, I. Karsai, E. Igartua, A. M. Casas
Abstract
Light spectra influence barley development, causing a diverse range of responses among cultivars that are poorly understood. Here, we exposed three barley genotypes with different light sensitivities to two light sources: fluorescent bulbs, over-representing green and red wavebands, and metal halide lamps, with a more balanced spectrum. We used RNA sequencing to identify the main genes and pathways involved in the different responses, and RT-qPCR to validate the expression values. Different grades of sensitivity to light spectra were associated with transcriptional reprogramming, plastid signals, and photosynthesis. The genotypes were especially divergent in the expression of genes regulated by transcription factors from MADS-box, WRKY, and NAC families, and in specific photoreceptors such as phytochromes and cryptochromes. Variations in light spectra also affected the expression of circadian clock, flowering time, and frost tolerance genes, among others, resembling plant responses to temperature. The relation between PPD-H1, HvVRN1, and HvFT1 expression might explain genotypic differences. Light-sensitive genotypes experienced a partial reversion of the vernalization process and senescence-related stress under the less favorable light quality conditions. The observed light-quality sensitivities reveal a complex mechanism of adaptation to regions with specific light quality features and/or possible regulation of light spectra in plant development during early spring. HighlightDevelopment genes were affected by light quality in the barley varieties tested. Different grades of sensitivity were related to the expression of transcription factors, senescence, light signaling and cold-regulated genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcriptome profiling of barley and tomato shoot and root meristems unravels physiological variations underlying photoperiodic sensitivity
Michael C. Schneider, Lucia Vedder, … Ali Ahmad Naz·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2022
- Small variations in temperature and photoperiod under field conditions in South America modified spring barley phenology and foliar development
Nicolás Mastandrea, Gastón Quero, … Ariel Castro·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Ppd-H1 integrates drought stress signals to control spike development and flowering time in barley
L. Gol, E. B. Haraldsson, M. von Korff Schmising·Journal of Experimental BotanyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2020
- Barley yield formation under abiotic stress depends on the interplay between flowering time genes and environmental cues
Mathias Wiegmann, Andreas Maurer, … Klaus Pillen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2019
- On the origin of photoperiod non-responsiveness in barley
- Long-day increase of HvVRN2 expression marks the deadline to fulfill the vernalization requirement in winter barley
Arantxa Monteagudo, Ernesto Igartua, … Ana M. Casas·bioRxiv·May 4, 2018