Cue-induced effects on decision-making distinguish subjects with gambling disorder from healthy controls
Alexander GenauckiD, Milan AndrejevićiD, Katharina Brehm, Caroline MatthisiD, Andreas HeinziD, André Weinreich, Norbert KathmanniD, Nina Romanczuk‐SeiferthiD
Abstract
While an increased impact of cues on decision-making has been associated with substance dependence, it is yet unclear whether this is also a phenotype of non-substance related addictive disorders, such as gambling disorder. To better understand the basic mechanisms of impaired decision-making in addiction, we investigated whether cue-induced changes in decision-making could distinguish gambling disorder (GD) from healthy control (HC) subjects. We expected that cue-induced changes in gamble acceptance and specifically in loss aversion would distinguish GD from HC subjects. 30 GD subjects and 30 matched HC subjects completed a mixed gambles task where gambling and other emotional cues were shown in the background. We used machine learning and classification to carve out the importance of cue-dependency of decision-making and of loss aversion for distinguishing GD from HC subjects. Cross-validated classification yielded an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) of 68.9% (p=0.002). Applying the classifier to an independent sample yielded an AUC-ROC of 65.0% (p=0.047). As expected, the classifier used cue-induced changes in gamble acceptance to distinguish GD from HC. Especially increased gambling during the presentation of gambling cues was characteristic of GD subjects. However, unexpectedly, cue-induced changes in loss aversion were irrelevant for distinguishing GD from HC subjects. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the classificatory power of addiction-relevant behavioral task parameters when distinguishing GD from HC subjects. The results indicate that cue-induced changes in decision-making are a characteristic feature of addictive disorders, independent of a substance of abuse.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural correlates of cue-induced changes in decision-making distinguish subjects with gambling disorder from healthy controls
Alexander Genauck, Caroline Matthis, … Nina Romanczuk‐Seiferth·Addiction BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2020
- Gambling environment exposure increases temporal discounting but improves model-based control in regular slot-machine gamblers.
Ben Wagner, David Mathar, Jan Peters·Computational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Audiovisual cues must be predictable and win-paired to drive risky choice
B. A. Hathaway, D. R. Kim, … C. A. Winstanley·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2022
- Win-concurrent sensory cues can promote riskier choice
Mariya V. Cherkasova, Luke Clark, … Catharine A. Winstanley·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2018
- Attenuated directed exploration during reinforcement learning in gambling disorder
Antonius Wiehler, Karima Chakroun, Jan Peters·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2021
- Striatal ups or downs? Neural correlates of monetary reward anticipation, cue reactivity and their interaction in alcohol use disorder and gambling disorder
Tim van Timmeren, Ruth Janke van Holst, Anna E. Goudriaan·Journal of Behavioral AddictionsPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2023