CellGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic modifiers and ascertainment drive variable expressivity of complex disorders
Matthew JenseniD, Corrine SmoleniD, Anastasia TyryshkinaiD, Lucilla PizzoiD, Jiawan SuniD, Serena NossiD, Deepro BanerjeeiD, Matthew T. OetjensiD, Hermela ShimelisiD, Cora M. TayloriD, Vijay Kumar PounrajaiD, Hyebin SongiD, Laura Rohan, Emily HuberiD, Laïla El KhattabiiD, Ingrid M.B.H. van de LaariD, Rafik TadrosiD, Connie R. BezzinaiD, Marjon van Slegtenhorst, Janneke A.E. KammeraadiD, Paolo PronteraiD, Jean‐Hubert CabergiD, Harry G. FraseriD, Siddharth BankaiD, Anke Van DijckiD, , Santhosh GirirajaniD
Abstract
Variable expressivity of disease-associated variants implies a role for secondary variants that modify clinical features. We assessed the effects of modifier variants towards clinical outcomes of 2,252 individuals with primary variants. Among 132 families with the 16p12.1 deletion, distinct rare and common variant classes conferred risk for specific developmental features, including short tandem repeats for neurological defects and SNVs for microcephaly, while additional disease-associated variants conferred multiple genetic diagnoses. Within disease and population cohorts of 773 individuals with the 16p12.1 deletion, we found opposing effects of secondary variants towards clinical features across ascertainments. Additional analysis of 1,479 probands with other primary variants, such as 16p11.2 deletion and CHD8 variants, and 1,084 without primary variants, showed that phenotypic associations differed by primary variant context and were influenced by synergistic interactions between primary and secondary variants. Our study provides a paradigm to dissect the genomic architecture of complex disorders towards personalized treatment.
- organism: human
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combinatorial patterns of gene expression changes contribute to variable expressivity of the developmental delay-associated 16p12.1 deletion
Matthew Jensen, Anastasia Tyryshkina, … Santhosh Girirajan·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2021
- Rare variants in the genetic background modulate the expressivity of neurodevelopmental disorders
Lucilla Pizzo, Matthew Jensen, … Santhosh Girirajan·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2018
- An integrated framework for functional dissection of variable expressivity in genetic disorders
Jiawan Sun, Serena Noss, … Santhosh Girirajan·medRxiv·Jul 22, 2025
- Genetic modifiers of rare variants in monogenic developmental disorder loci
Rebecca Kingdom, Robin N. Beaumont, … Caroline Fiona Wright·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2024
- Polygenic modifiers of expressivity in telomere biology disorders
Michael Poeschla, Uma P. Arora, … Vijay G. Sankaran·Journal of Clinical InvestigationPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2025
- Assortative mating and parental genetic relatedness drive the pathogenicity of variably expressive variants
Corrine Smolen, Matthew Jensen, … Santhosh Girirajan·medRxiv·May 18, 2023