Journal of NeuroimagingBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
SS-Detect: Development and Validation of a New Strategy for Source-Based Morphometry in Multi-Scanner Studies
Ruiyang GeiD, Shiqing Ding, Tyler Keeling, William G. HoneriD, Sophia FrangouiD, Fidel Vila‐RodrigueziD
Abstract
Background and PurposeSource-based morphometry (SBM) has been used in multi-centre studies pooling magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data across different scanners to advance the reproducibility of neuroscience research. In the present study, we developed an analysis strategy for Scanner-Specific Detection (SS-Detect) of SBPs in multi-scanner studies, and evaluated its performance relative to a conventional strategy. MethodsIn the first experiment, the SimTB toolbox was used to generate simulated datasets mimicking twenty different scanners with common and scanner-specific SBPs. In the second experiment, we generated one simulated SBP from empirical gray matter volume (GMV) datasets from two different scanners. Moreover, we applied two strategies to compare SBPs between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls GMV from two different scanners. ResultsThe outputs of the conventional strategy were limited to whole-sample-level results across all scanners; the outputs of SS-Detect included whole-sample-level and scanner-specific results. In the first simulation experiment, SS-Detect successfully estimated all simulated SBPs, including the common and scanner-specific SBPs whereas the conventional strategy detected only some of the whole-sample SBPs. The second simulation experiment showed that both strategies could detect the simulated SBP. Quantitative evaluations of both experiments demonstrated greater accuracy of the SS-Detect in estimating spatial SBPs and subject-specific loading parameters. In the third experiment, SS-Detect detected more significant between-group SBPs, and these SBPs corresponded with the results from voxel-based morphometry analysis, suggesting that SS-Detect has higher sensitivity in detecting between-group differences. ConclusionsSS-Detect outperformed the conventional strategy and can be considered advantageous when SBM is applied to a multi-scanner study.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 35%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- dcSBM: A federated constrained source-based morphometry approach for multivariate brain structure mapping
Debbrata K. Saha, Rogers F. Silva, … Vince D. Calhoun·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2023
- Inter-scanner brain MRI volumetric biases persist even in a harmonized multi-subject study of multiple sclerosis
Kelly A. Clark, Carly M. O’Donnell, … the NAIMS Cooperative·bioRxiv·May 5, 2022
- Mode-based morphometry: A multiscale approach to mapping human neuroanatomy
Trang Ngoc Cao, James Christopher S. Pang, … Alex Fornito·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024
- Precision Brain Morphometry: Feasibility and Opportunities of Extreme Rapid Scans
Jared Allen Nielsen, Ross William Mair, … Randy L. Buckner·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2019
- Detecting and harmonizing scanner differences in the ABCD study - annual release 1.0
Dylan M. Nielson, Francisco Pereira, … Peter A. Bandettini·bioRxiv·May 2, 2018
- Does higher sampling rate (Multiband + SENSE) benefit the detection of task correlated BOLD for cognitive neuroscience applications at 3T?
Ritu Bhandari, Evgeniya P. Kirilina, … Valeria Gazzola·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2019