Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Benefits of individualized brain anatomies and EEG electrode positions for auditory cortex localization
Karolina IgnatiadisiD, Roberto BarumerliiD, Brigitta TóthiD, Robert BaumgartneriD
Abstract
Due to its high temporal resolution and non-invasive nature, electroencephalography (EEG) is considered a method of great value for the field of auditory cognitive neuroscience. In performing source space analyses, localization accuracy poses a bottleneck, which precise forward models based on individualized attributes such as subject anatomy or electrode locations aim to overcome. Yet acquiring anatomical images or localizing EEG electrodes requires significant additional funds and processing time, making it an oftentimes inaccessible asset. Neuroscientific software offers template solutions, on which analyses can be based. For localizing the source of auditory evoked responses, we here compared the results of employing such template anatomies and electrode positions versus the subject-specific ones, as well as combinations of the two. All considered cases represented approaches commonly used in electrophysiological studies. We considered differences between two commonly used inverse solutions (dSPM, sLORETA) and targeted the primary auditory cortex; a notoriously small cortical region that is located within the lateral sulcus, thus more prone to errors in localization. Through systematical comparison of the outcomes in terms of auditory activity attributes and leakage quantification, we assessed how the individualization steps impacted the analyses outcomes. Both electrode locations as well as subject anatomies were found to have an effect, which though varied based on the configuration considered. When comparing the inverse solutions, we moreover found that dSPM more consistently benefited from individualization of subject characteristics. Based on the scientific question considered, our results may be used to facilitate the planning of auditory neuroscientific experiments in terms of expected infrastructure, personnel and funds.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Field percentile
- top 25%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EEG Electrodes and Where to Find Them: Automated Localization From 3D Scans
Mats Tveter, Thomas Tveitstøl, … Ira Haraldsen·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2024
- Improved Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Fields using Reciprocal BEM-FMM
Derek A. Drumm, Guillermo Nuñez Ponasso, … Zhi‐De Deng·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2026
- Performance evaluation of inverse methods for identification and characterization of oscillatory brain sources: Ground truth validation & empirical evidences
Tamesh Halder, Siddharth Talwar, … Arpan Banerjee·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- Single-channel in-Ear-EEG detects the focus of auditory attention to concurrent tone streams and mixed speech
Lorenz Fiedler, Malte Wöstmann, … Jonas Obleser·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2017
- EEG Responses to Auditory Figure-Ground Perception
Xiaoxuan Guo, Pradeep Dheerendra, … Timothy David Griffiths·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 16, 2022
- Speaker Identity is Robustly Encoded in Spatial Patterns of Intracranial EEG for Attention Decoding
Sukru Samet Dindar, Xilin Jiang, … Nima Mesgarani·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2025