PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Academic Tracker: Software for Tracking and Reporting Publications Associated with Authors and Grants
P. Travis ThompsoniD, Christian D. PowelliD, Hunter MoseleyiD
Abstract
In recent years, United States federal funding agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), have implemented public access policies to make research supported by funding from these federal agencies freely available to the public. Enforcement is primarily through annual and final reports submitted to these funding agencies, where all peer-reviewed publications must be registered through the appropriate mechanism as required by the specific federal funding agency. Unreported and/or incorrectly reported papers can result in delayed acceptance of annual and final reports and even funding delays for current and new research grants. So, its important to make sure every peer-reviewed publication is reported properly and in a timely manner. For large collaborative research efforts, the tracking and proper registration of peer-reviewed publications along with generation of accurate annual and final reports can create a large administrative burden. With large collaborative teams, it is easy for these administrative tasks to be overlooked, forgotten, or lost in the shuffle. In order to help with this reporting burden, we have developed the Academic Tracker software package, implemented in the Python 3 programming language and supporting Linux, Windows, and Mac operating systems. Academic Tracker helps with publication tracking and reporting by comprehensively searching major peer-reviewed publication tracking web portals, including PubMed, Crossref, ORCID, and Google Scholar, given a list of authors. Academic Tracker provides highly customizable reporting templates so information about the resulting publications is easily transformed into appropriate formats for tracking and reporting purposes. The source code and extensive documentation is hosted on GitHub (https://moseleybioinformaticslab.github.io/academic_tracker/) and is also available on the Python Package Index (https://pypi.org/project/academic_tracker) for easy installation.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 31%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- nihexporter: an R package for NIH funding data
Jay Hesselberth, Erin Baschal, … Yuying Wang·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2015
- From Policy to Practice: Tracking an Open Science Funding Initiative
K. Ratan, S. B. Dumanis, … E. A. U. Riley·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2023
- Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open?
S. Serghiou, D. G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, … J. P. A. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2020
- Adding software to package management systems can increase their citation by 280%
Vahid Jalili, Dave Clements, … Jeremy Goecks·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2020
- ScrapPaper: A web scrapping method to extract journal information from PubMed and Google Scholar search result using Python.
Mohd Rifqi Rafsanjani·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2022
- Looking into Pandora’s Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage
B. Greshake·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2017