From variability to consensus: rescoring harmonizes peptide identification across diverse search engines and datasets

Abstract

Peptide-spectrum match (PSM) rescoring has become standard in proteomics workflows, improving peptide identification accuracy across diverse search engines. Despite the availability of multiple rescoring strategies, systematic comparisons spanning several search engines, datasets, and database configurations remain limited. Here, we benchmarked seven publicly available search engines, evaluating standard target-decoy-based false discovery rate (FDR) estimation alongside Percolator, MS2Rescore, and Oktoberfest across four datasets acquired on different mass spectrometry platforms in data-dependent mode and searched against protein databases of varying size and composition. Rescoring substantially increased identification consensus and reduced variability between search engines, with prediction-based approaches yielding the largest gains. While database size had limited impact for human datasets, it significantly affected identification rates on a metaproteomic dataset. Entrapment-based evaluation indicated generally adequate FDR control across methods, although prediction-based rescoring exhibited a higher tendency toward FDR underestimation in specific configurations. Overall, advanced rescoring strategies harmonize peptide identification outcomes across search engines, thereby enhancing robustness and comparability in proteomics analyses. However, careful feature selection and appropriate database choice remain essential to ensure reliable FDR control and optimal performance across diverse experimental settings.