Machine learning-based rescoring with MS2Rescore boosts peptide identification and taxonomic specificity in metaproteomics
Xuxa MallietiD, Arthur DeclercqiD, Ralf GabrielsiD, Tanja HolsteiniD, Bart MesuereiD, Thilo MuthiD, Pieter VerschaffeltiD, Lennart MartensiD, Tim Van Den BosscheiD
Abstract
BackgroundMetaproteomics, the study of the collective proteome within microbial ecosystems, has gained increasing interest over the past decade. However, peptide identification rates in metaproteomics remain low compared to single-species proteomics. A key challenge is the identification sensitivity of current identification algorithms, which were primarily designed for single-species analyses. Addressing this, we evaluated the machine learning-driven MS{superscript 2}Rescore post-processing tool on multiple metaproteomics datasets from diverse microbial environments and benchmark studies. ResultsWe demonstrate that machine learning-driven rescoring outperforms traditional metaproteomics identification workflows. It significantly increases peptide identification rates compared to Sage, which itself already implements basic rescoring. Moreover, it enables lowering the false discovery rate (FDR) to 0.1% with minimal to no sensitivity loss, a substantial improvement over the 1% or 5% FDR thresholds commonly used in metaproteomics, in turn leading to greater confidence in downstream taxonomic annotation. ConclusionsOur findings show that MS{superscript 2}Rescore substantially improves peptide identification sensitivity as well as specificity in metaproteomics, and delivers improved confidence in taxonomic annotation. This advancement results in a more reliable downstream taxonomic analysis, reinforcing the potential of machine learning-based rescoring in metaproteomics research.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Peptonizer2000: bringing confidence to metaproteomics
Tanja Holstein, Pieter Verschaffelt, … Thilo Muth·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2026
- Comparative Performance of Scribe and Database Search Engines in Metaproteomic Profiling of a Ground-Truth Microbiome Dataset
Andrew T. Rajczewski, Subina Mehta, … Pratik Dilip Jagtap·Journal of ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2025
- From variability to consensus: rescoring harmonizes peptide identification across diverse search engines and datasets
Dirk Winkelhardt, Sven Berres, Julian Uszkoreit·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2026
- MetaNovo: a probabilistic approach to peptide discovery in complex mass spectrometry datasets
Matthys Gerhardus Potgieter, Andrew JM Nel, … Jonathan M Blackburn·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2022
- MegaPX: fast and space-efficient peptide assignment method using IBF-based multi-indexing
Ahmad Lutfi, Tanja Holstein, … Thilo Muth·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2026
- Biological Function Assignment Across Taxonomic Levels in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Metaproteomics via a Modified Expectation Maximization Algorithm
Gelio Alves, Aleksey Y. Ogurtsov, Yi‐Kuo Yu·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2025