Changing environments and genetic variation: inbreeding does not compromise short-term physiological responses
Abstract
O_LISelfing plant lineages are surprisingly widespread and successful in a broad range of environments, despite showing reduced genetic diversity, which is predicted to reduce long-term evolutionary potential. However, short-term capacity to respond appropriately to new conditions might not require high levels of standing genetic variation. The purpose of this study was to directly test whether mating system variation and its associated changes in genetic variability in natural populations affected responses to short-term environmental challenges.\nC_LIO_LIWe compared relative fitness and metabolome profiles of naturally outbreeding (genetically diverse) and inbreeding (genetically depauperate) populations of a long-lived perennial plant, Arabidopsis lyrata, under constant growth chamber conditions and an outdoor common garden environment outside its native range.\nC_LIO_LIWe found no effect of mating system on survival or reproductive output, although several phenological traits showed different associations with latitude for outcrossing and inbreeding populations. Natural inbreeding had no effect on the plasticity of physiological responses, using either multivariate approaches or analysis of variation in individual metabolites. Moreover, while both growing environment and time significantly affected the relative abundance of individual metabolites, inbreeding populations responded similarly to outbreeding populations, suggesting adaptation to the outdoor environment, regardless of mating system.\nC_LIO_LIWe conclude that low genetic diversity in naturally inbred populations may not compromise fitness or short-term capacity for appropriate physiological responses to environmental change. The absence of natural costs of inbreeding could help to explain the global success of clonal or asexual mating strategies for adapting to a wide range of environments.\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hidden genetic variation in plasticity increases the potential to adapt to novel environments
G. M. Walter, J. Clark, … J. R. Bridle·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2020
- Differentiation for drought strategy but conserved plasticity to heat and drought in locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana
Sophia F. Buysse, Victoria Nicholes, … Emily B. Josephs·Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Competition-by-drought interactions change phenotypic plasticity and the direction of selection on Arabidopsis traits
C. M. Lorts, J. R. Lasky·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2020
- Ecophysiological traits of a clonal grass in its climate change response
V. Kosova, T. Hajek, … Z. Munzbergova·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2019
- Trade-offs between averages and intra-individual variation within vegetative, phenological, and floral traits
Charlotte Møller, Martí March‐Salas, … J. F. N. Scheepens·American Journal of BotanyPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- A century of allopatry: plasticity and rapid selection shape phenotypic trait variability under contrasting environments.
Hervé Rogissart, Martín Daufresne, … Allan Raffard·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026