BMC BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A comparison of reference-based algorithms for correcting cell-type heterogeneity in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies
Andrew Erich TeschendorffiD, Charles E. BreezeiD, Shijie ZhengiD, Stephan BeckiD
Abstract
BackgroundIntra-sample cellular heterogeneity presents numerous challenges to the identification of biomarkers in large Epigenome-Wide Association Studies (EWAS). While a number of reference-based deconvolution algorithms have emerged, their potential remains underexplored and a comparative evaluation of these algorithms beyond tissues such as blood is still lacking.\n\nResultsHere we present a novel framework for reference-based inference, which leverages cell-type specific DNAse Hypersensitive Site (DHS) information from the NIH Epigenomics Roadmap to construct an improved reference DNA methylation database. We show that this leads to a marginal but statistically significant improvement of cell-count estimates in whole blood as well as in mixtures involving epithelial cell-types. Using this framework we compare a widely used state-of-the-art reference-based algorithm (called constrained projection) to two non-constrained approaches including CIBERSORT and a method based on robust partial correlations. We conclude that the widely-used constrained projection technique may not always be optimal. Instead, we find that the method based on robust partial correlations is generally more robust across a range of different tissue types and for realistic noise levels. We call the combined algorithm which uses DHS data and robust partial correlations for inference, EpiDISH (Epigenetic Dissection of Intra-Sample Heterogeneity). Finally, we demonstrate the added value of EpiDISH in an EWAS of smoking.\n\nConclusionsEstimating cell-type fractions and subsequent inference in EWAS may benefit from the use of non-constrained reference-based cell-type deconvolution methods.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: deconvolution
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 548
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Correcting For Cell-Type Heterogeneity In Epigenome-Wide Association Studies: Premature Analyses And Conclusions
Shijie Zheng, Stephan Beck, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2017
- Calling differential DNA methylation at cell-type resolution: an objective status-quo
Jing Han, Shijie Zheng, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2019
- Uncertainty quantification of reference based cellular deconvolution algorithms
Dorothea Seiler Vellame, Gemma L. Shireby, … Eilis J. Hannon·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2022
- Identification of differentially methylated cell-types in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies
Shijie Zheng, Charles E. Breeze, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2018
- Calling differential DNA methylation at cell-type resolution: avoiding misconceptions and promoting best practices
Jing Han, Shijie Zheng, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2021
- Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data
Kristina Gervin, Lucas A. Salas, … Meaghan J. Jones·Clinical EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2019