NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
EEG-based classification of natural sounds reveals specialized responses to speech and music
Abstract
Humans can easily distinguish many sounds in the environment, but speech and music are uniquely important. Previous studies, mostly using fMRI, have identified separate regions of the brain that respond selectively for speech and music. Yet there is little evidence that brain responses are larger and more temporally precise for human-specific sounds like speech and music, as has been found for responses to species-specific sounds in other animals. We recorded EEG as healthy, adult subjects listened to various types of two-second-long natural sounds. By classifying each sound based on the EEG response, we found that speech, music, and impact sounds were classified better than other natural sounds. But unlike impact sounds, the classification accuracy for speech and music dropped for synthesized sounds that have identical \"low-level\" acoustic statistics based on a subcortical model, indicating a selectivity for higher-order features in these sounds. Lastly, the trends in average power and phase consistency of the two-second EEG responses to each sound replicated the patterns of speech and music selectivity observed with classification accuracy. Together with the classification results, this suggests that the brain produces temporally individualized responses to speech and music sounds that are stronger than the responses to other natural sounds. In addition to highlighting the importance of speech and music for the human brain, the techniques used here could be a cost-effective and efficient way to study the human brains selectivity for speech and music in other populations.\n\nHighlightsO_LIEEG responses are stronger to speech and music than to other natural sounds\nC_LIO_LIThis selectivity was not replicated using stimuli with the same acoustic statistics\nC_LIO_LIThese techniques can be a cost-effective way to study speech and music selectivity\nC_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 39
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A robust voice-selective response in the human brain as revealed by electrophysiological recordings and fast periodic auditory stimulation
Francesca M. Barbero, Roberta P. Calce, … Olivier Collignon·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2021
- Intracranial recordings from human auditory cortex reveal a neural population selective for musical song
Sam Norman-Haignere, Jenelle Feather, … Nancy Kanwisher·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2020
- Speech categorization is better described by induced rather than evoked neural activity
Md Sultan Mahmud, Mohammed Yeasin, Gavin M. Bidelman·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2021
- Speech and music recruit frequency-specific distributed and overlapping cortical networks
Noémie te Rietmolen, Manuel R. Mercier, … Daniele Schön·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans
Karl D. Lerud, Charlie Fisher, … Jonathan Z. Simon·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2026
- Behavioral and neural sound classification: Insights from natural and synthetic sounds
Mattson Ogg·bioRxiv·Jan 6, 2025