bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablates rabbit VX2 liver tumors in a non-thermal manner versus radiofrequency ablation
Q.-G. Li, Z.-G. Liu, Y. Sun, Y.-W. Zou, X.-L. Chen, B. Wu, X.-H. Chen, Z. Ren
Abstract
BackgroundLiver tumor remains an important cause of cancer-related death. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) are advantageous in the treatment of melanoma and pancreatic cancer, but their therapeutic application on liver tumors need to be further studied. MethodsHep3B cells were treated with nsPEFs. The biological behaviors of cells were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8, 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) assays. In vivo, rabbit VX2 liver tumor models were ablated by ultrasound-guided nsPEFs and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was used to evaluate the ablation effect. HE staining and Masson staining were used to evaluate the tissue morphology after ablation. Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine the expression of Ki67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and -smooth muscle actin at different time points after ablation. ResultsThe cell viability of Hep3B cells was continuously lower than that of the control group within 3 days after pulse treatment. The proliferation of Hep3B cells was significantly affected by nsPEFs. TEM showed that Hep3B cells underwent significant morphological changes after pulse treatment. In vivo, CEUS imaging showed that nsPEFs could completely ablate model rabbit VX2 liver tumors. After nsPEFs ablation, the area of tumor fibrosis and the expression of Ki67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and -smooth muscle actin were decreased. However, after RFA, rabbit VX2 liver tumor tissue showed complete necrosis, but the expression of PCNA and -smooth muscle actin did not decrease compared to the tumor group. ConclusionsnsPEFs can induce Hep3B cells apoptosis and ablate rabbit VX2 liver tumors in a non-thermal manner versus RFA. The ultrasound contrast agent can monitor immediate effect of nsPEF ablation. This study provides a basis for the clinical study of nsPEFs ablation of liver cancer.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Selective Ablation of Cancer Cells with Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound
D. R. Mittelstein, J. Ye, … M. Gharib·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2019
- Laser-driven VHEE pulsed fast fractionation (PFF): second-scale inter-pulse timing can modulate normal tissue toxicity in vivo
Camilla Giaccaglia, Émilie Bayart, … A. Flacco·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2026
- Efficient ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to orthotopic liver tumors: Direct comparison of doxorubicin-loaded nanobubbles and microbubbles
P. A. Nittayacharn, E. Abenojar, … A. Exner·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2023
- Quantification of thermal side effects during pulsed field ablation
Marcela Mercado‐Montoya, Tatiana Gomez Bustamante, … Lawrence Overzet·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2024
- Transarterial Embolization Using a Liquid Embolic Enhances Tumor Necrosis to Enable Improved Efficacy Compared with a Particle Embolic in a Translational Rat Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Alexey Gurevich, Ariful Islam, … Terence P.F. Gade·bioRxiv·May 23, 2024
- Ultrasound-Mediated Drug-free Theranostics for Treatment of Prostate Cancer
R. H. Perera, F. M. Berg, … A. A. Exner·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2023