MindfulnessNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Meditators probably show increased behaviour-monitoring related neural activity
Neil Wayne BaileyiD, Harry Geddes, Isabella Zannettino, Gregory HumbleiD, Jake PayneiD, Oliver Baell, Melanie Emonson, Sung Wook ChungiD, Aron T. HilliD, Nigel C. RogaschiD, Jakob HohwyiD, Paul Bernard FitzgeraldiD
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Abstract
ObjectivesMindfulness meditation is associated with better attention function. Performance monitoring and error-processing are important aspects of attention. We investigated whether experienced meditators showed different neural activity related to performance monitoring and error-processing. Previous research has produced inconsistent results. This study used more rigorous analyses and a larger sample to resolve the inconsistencies. MethodsWe used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) following correct and incorrect responses to a Go/Nogo task from 27 experienced meditators and 27 non-meditators. ResultsNo differences were found in the ERN (all p > 0.05). Meditators showed larger global field potentials (GFP) in the Pe after both correct responses and errors, indicating stronger neural responses (p = 0.0190, FDR-p = 0.152, np2 = 0.0951, BFincl = 2.691). This effect did not pass multiple comparison controls. However, single electrode analysis of the Pe did pass multiple comparison controls (p = 0.002, FDR-p = 0.016, np2 = 0.133, BFincl = 220.659). Meditators also showed a significantly larger Pe GFP for errors only, which would have passed multiple comparison controls, but was not a primary analysis (p = 0.0028, np2 = 0.1493, BF10 = 9.999). ConclusionsMeditation may strengthen neural responses related to performance monitoring (measured by the Pe), but not specifically to error monitoring (although measurements of the Pe after errors may be more sensitive to group differences). However, only the single electrode analysis passed multiple comparison controls, while analysis including all electrodes did not, so this conclusion remains tentative.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mindfulness meditators do not show differences in electrophysiological measures of error processing
Neil Wayne Bailey, Kavya Raj, … Paul Bernard Fitzgerald·MindfulnessPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2019
- Neural differences in conflict monitoring and stimulus expectancy processes in experienced meditators are likely driven by enhanced attention
Aron T. Hill, Sung Wook Chung, … Neil Wayne Bailey·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2024
- Mindfulness meditators show altered distributions of early and late neural activity markers of attention in a response inhibition task
Neil Wayne Bailey, Gabrielle Freedman, … Paul Bernard Fitzgerald·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2019
- Experienced Meditators Show Multifaceted Attention-Related Differences in Neural Activity
Neil Wayne Bailey, Oliver Baell, … Paul Bernard Fitzgerald·MindfulnessPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2023
- Mindfulness meditators show enhanced working memory performance concurrent with different brain region engagement patterns during recall
Neil Wayne Bailey, Gabrielle Freedman, … Paul Bernard Fitzgerald·MindfulnessPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- Experienced meditators exhibit no differences to demographically-matched controls in theta phase synchronisation, P200, or P300 during an auditory oddball task
Jake Payne, Oliver Baell, … Neil Wayne Bailey·MindfulnessPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2019