Humans can visually judge grasp quality and refine their judgments through visual and haptic feedback
Guido MaielloiD, Marcel Schepko, Lina K. KleiniD, Vivian C. PauluniD, Roland W. FlemingiD
Abstract
How humans visually select where to grasp objects is determined by the physical object properties (e.g., size, shape, weight), the degrees of freedom of the arm and hand, as well as the task to be performed. We recently demonstrated that human grasps are near-optimal with respect to a weighted combination of different cost functions that make grasps uncomfortable, unstable or impossible e.g., due to unnatural grasp apertures or large torques. Here, we ask whether humans can consciously access these rules. We test if humans can explicitly judge grasp quality derived from rules regarding grasp size, orientation, torque, and visibility. More specifically, we test if grasp quality can be inferred (i) by using motor imagery alone, (ii) from watching grasps executed by others, and (iii) through performing grasps, i.e. receiving visual, proprioceptive and haptic feedback. Stimuli were novel objects made of 10 cubes of brass and wood (side length 2.5 cm) in various configurations. On each object, one near-optimal and one sub-optimal grasp were selected based on one cost function (e.g. torque), while the other constraints (grasp size, orientation, and visibility) were kept approximately constant or counterbalanced. Participants were visually cued to the location of the selected grasps on each object and verbally reported which of the two grasps was best. Across three experiments, participants could either (i) passively view the static objects, (ii) passively view videos of other participants grasping the objects, or (iii) actively grasp the objects themselves. Our results show that participants could already judge grasp optimality from simply viewing the objects, but were significantly better in the video and grasping session. These findings suggest that humans can determine grasp quality even without performing the grasp--perhaps through motor imagery--and can further refine their understanding of how to correctly grasp an object through sensorimotor feedback but also by passively viewing others grasp objects.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Field percentile
- top 21%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Object visibility, not energy expenditure, accounts for spatial biases in human grasp selection
Guido Maiello, Vivian C. Paulun, … Roland W. Fleming·i-PerceptionPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Friction is preferred over grasp configuration in precision grip grasping
Lina K. Klein, Guido Maiello, … Dimitris Voudouris·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2021
- Why some size illusions affect grip aperture
Jeroen B. J. Smeets, Erik Kleijn, … Eli Brenner·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- Distinct neural components of visually guided grasping during planning and execution
Lina K. Klein, Guido Maiello, … Roland W. Fleming·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2023
- Integration of haptics and vision in human multisensory grasping
Ivan Camponogara, Robert Volcic·CortexPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2020
- Does Precision Grip Research Extend to Unconstrained, Multidigit Grasping?
Fabrizio Lepori, Frieder Hartmann, … Guido Maiello·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2025