Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Spoken language comprehension activates the primary visual cortex

Anna Seydell‐GreenwaldiD, Xiaoying WangiD, Elissa L. NewportiD, Yanchao BiiD, Ella Striem-AmitiD

Abstract

Primary visual cortex (V1) is generally thought of as a low-level sensory area that primarily processes basic visual features. However, in congenitally blind individuals, V1 is involved in language processing, with no evidence of major changes in anatomical connectivity that could explain this seemingly drastic functional change. This is at odds with current accounts of neural plasticity, which emphasize the role of connectivity and conserved function in determining a neural tissues role even after atypical early experiences. To reconcile what appears to be unprecedented functional reorganization with known accounts of plasticity limitations, we tested whether V1 also responds to spoken language in sighted individuals. Using fMRI, we found that V1 in normally sighted individuals was indeed activated by comprehensible speech as compared to a reversed speech control condition, in a left-lateralized and focal manner. Activation in V1 for language was also significant and comparable for abstract and concrete words, suggesting it was not driven by visual imagery. Last, this activation did not stem from increased attention to the auditory onset of words, excluding general attention accounts. Together these findings suggest that V1 responds to verbal information even in sighted individuals, potentially to predict visual input. This capability might be the basis for the strong V1 language activation observed in people born blind, re-affirming the notion that plasticity is guided by pre-existing connectivity and abilities in the typically developed brain. Significance statementHow flexible is the human brain? Studies of congenitally blind individuals showed that language activates the primary visual cortex. This has been interpreted as evidence for unprecedented functional plasticity from a low-level visual to a language area. To reconcile these findings with known limitations of plasticity based on intrinsic physiology and connectivity, we tested if similar activation can be found in sighted participants. We show that left-lateralized primary visual cortex is activated by spoken language comprehension in sighted individuals, . This suggests that plasticity even in complete blindness from birth is not limitless and is guided by pre-existing connectivity and abilities in the typically-developed brain.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sighted participants show left-lateralized, focal V1 activation for comprehensible speech versus reversed speech, independent of word concreteness or attention to word onsets.

Language responses in primary visual cortex (V1) of congenitally blind people have been read as functional reorganization without any matching change in anatomical connectivity, which conflicts with accounts in which plasticity is bounded by existing wiring and conserved function. Showing the same response in the sighted brain would recast the blind case as amplification of a property the typical brain already has.

Key results

  1. SuggestedIn normally sighted participants, V1 responded more to comprehensible spoken language than to a reversed-speech control, and the response was focal and lateralized to the left hemisphere.

    fMRI contrast of comprehensible speech against a reversed-speech control; the abstract reports the activation as significant and left-lateralized but gives no coordinates, effect sizes or statistics. · Abstract

  2. SuggestedThe V1 language response does not appear to be a by-product of visual imagery, since abstract and concrete words drove it similarly.

    Activation reported as significant and comparable for abstract and for concrete words; no numbers, equivalence test or power estimate is given for this comparison. · Abstract

  3. ClaimedThe response is also attributed to something other than heightened attention at the acoustic onset of words.

    The authors state that the activation did not arise from increased attention to auditory word onsets, which they take to exclude a general-attention explanation; the control analysis itself is not described in the abstract. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Functional MRI in normally sighted participants, contrasting comprehensible spoken language with a reversed-speech control, with additional comparisons of abstract versus concrete words and a check against attention to auditory word onsets.

  • fMRI scans of normally sighted participants listening to spoken language and to reversed speech · human
Methods & tools
fMRI
Limitations (2)
  • No sample size, statistical thresholds or effect sizes are reported, so the size and reliability of the V1 language effect cannot be judged from the available text. · noted in this summary
  • The argument against visual imagery rests on a comparison in which abstract and concrete words did not differ, i.e. on an absence of a difference rather than on positive evidence. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you work on cortical plasticity, blindness or language networks and want to know whether V1 language responses exist in the typically developed brain.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISUrbaniak '25Paczyńska '25Pant '19Saccone '24Ackeren '18Abboud '19
79% semantic matchNeuroscience
Marta Urbaniak, Małgorzata Paczyńska, Alfonso Caramazza+1 more·Nature Communications·Aug 29, 2025· 5 citations