Data Reuse and the Social Capital of Open Science
Abstract
Participation in open data initiatives require two semi-independent actions: the sharing of data produced by a researcher or group, and a consumer of shared data. Consumers of shared data range from people interested in validating the results of a given study to people who actively transform the available data. These data transformers are of particular interest because they add value to the shared data set through the discovery of new relationships and information which can in turn be shared with the same community. The complex and often reciprocal relationship between producers and consumers can be better understood using game theory, namely by using three variations of the Prisoners Dilemma (PD): a classical PD payoff matrix, a simulation of the PD n-person iterative model that tests three hypotheses, and an Ideological Game Theory (IGT) model used to formulate how sharing strategies might be implemented in a specific institutional culture. To motivate these analyses, data sharing is presented as a trade-off between economic and social payoffs. This is demonstrated as a series of payoff matrices describing situations ranging from ubiquitous acceptance of Open Science principles to a community standard of complete non-cooperation. Further context is provided through the IGT model, which allows from the modeling of cultural biases and beliefs that influence open science decision-making. A vision for building a CC-BY economy are then discussed using an approach called econosemantics, which complements the treatment of data sharing as a complex system of transactions enabled by social capital.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of the impact of shared data on the scientific literature
Michael Peter Milham, Richard Cameron Craddock, … Arno Klein·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2018
- Sharing is not erring: Pseudo-reciprocity in collective search
Imen Bouhlel, Charley M. Wu, … Robert L. Goldstone·bioRxiv·May 14, 2018
- Individual Decision-Making Underlying the Tragedy of the Commons
M. Chawla, M. Piva, … S. W. C. Chang·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2022
- The Rise of Open Data Practices Among Bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh
Haya Deeb, Suzanna Creasey, … Andrew John Millar·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2025
- Information sharing for a coordination game in fluctuating environments
K. Paarporn, C. Eksin, J. S. Weitz·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2018
- Dataset Decay: the problem of sequential analyses on open datasets
William Hedley Thompson, Jessey Wright, … Russell Alan Poldrack·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 19, 2020