Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionbioRxiv
Preprint

Sharing is not erring: Pseudo-reciprocity in collective search

Imen Bouhlel, Charley M. WuiD, Nobuyuki Hanaki, Robert L. Goldstone

Abstract

Information sharing in competitive environments may seem counterintuitive, yet it is widely observed in humans and other animals. For instance, the open-source software movement has led to new and valuable technologies being released publicly to facilitate broader collaboration and further innovation. What drives this behavior and under which conditions can it be beneficial for an individual? Using simulations in both static and dynamic environments, we show that sharing information can lead to individual benefits through the mechanisms of pseudo-reciprocity, whereby shared information leads to by-product benefits for an individual without the need for explicit reciprocation. Crucially, imitation with a certain level of innovation is required to avoid a tragedy of the commons, while the mechanism of a local visibility radius allows for the coordination of self-organizing collectives of agents. When these two mechanisms are present, we find robust evidence for the benefits of sharing--even when others do not reciprocate.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTump '19Paarporn '18Yahosseini '19Aarts '25Bassanetti '26Mezey '23
77% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
A. Novaes Tump, C. M. Wu, I. Bouhlel+1 more·bioRxiv·May 11, 2019