Agent-based model demonstrates the impact of nonlinear, complex interactions between cytokines on muscle regeneration
Megan HaaseiD, Tien ComlekogluiD, Alexa PetruccianiiD, Shayn M. PeirceiD, Silvia S. BlemkeriD
Abstract
Muscle regeneration is a complex process due to dynamic and multiscale biochemical and cellular interactions, making it difficult to identify microenvironmental conditions that are beneficial to muscle recovery from injury using experimental approaches alone. To understand the degree to which individual cellular behaviors impact endogenous mechanisms of muscle recovery, we developed an agent-based model (ABM) using the Cellular Potts framework to simulate the dynamic microenvironment of a cross-section of murine skeletal muscle tissue. We referenced more than 100 published studies to define over 100 parameters and rules that dictate the behavior of muscle fibers, satellite stem cells (SSC), fibroblasts, neutrophils, macrophages, microvessels, and lymphatic vessels, as well as their interactions with each other and the microenvironment. We utilized parameter density estimation to calibrate the model to temporal biological datasets describing cross-sectional area (CSA) recovery, SSC, and fibroblast cell counts at multiple time points following injury. The calibrated model was validated by comparison of other model outputs (macrophage, neutrophil, and capillaries counts) to experimental observations. Predictions for eight model perturbations that varied cell or cytokine input conditions were compared to published experimental studies to validate model predictive capabilities. We used Latin hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation coefficient to identify in silico perturbations of cytokine diffusion coefficients and decay rates to enhance CSA recovery. This analysis suggests that combined alterations of specific cytokine decay and diffusion parameters result in greater fibroblast and SSC proliferation compared to individual perturbations with a 13% increase in CSA recovery compared to unaltered regeneration at 28 days. These results enable guided development of therapeutic strategies that similarly alter muscle physiology (i.e. converting ECM-bound cytokines into freely diffusible forms as studied in cancer therapeutics or delivery of exogenous cytokines) during regeneration to enhance muscle recovery after injury.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Field percentile
- top 29%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Injury-Specific Muscle Regeneration: A Computational Blueprint for Cellular and Cytokine Drivers
Megan Haase, Tien Comlekoglu, … Silvia S. Blemker·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2026
- Contributions of individual satellite cells to muscle regeneration assessed using a confetti mouse model
H. Heemskerk, N. S. Jagannathan, … L. Tucker-Kellogg·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2023
- Differential Equation Modeling of Cell Population Dynamics in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data
Renad Al-Ghazawi, Xiaojian Shao, Theodore J. Perkins·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2024
- Intravital microscopy of satellite cell dynamics and their interaction with myeloid cells during skeletal muscle regeneration
- Myo-REG: a portal for signaling interactions in muscle regeneration
Alessandro Palma, Alberto Calderone, … Gianni Cesareni·Frontiers in PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2019
- Myofiber injury induces capillary disruption and regeneration of disorganized microvascular networks
N. L. Jacobsen, C. E. Norton, … S. S. Segal·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2021