Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

The speed of human social interaction perception

Leyla IşıkiD, Anna MynickiD, Dimitrios PantazisiD, Nancy KanwisheriD

Abstract

The ability to detect and understand other peoples social interactions is a fundamental part of the human visual experience that develops early in infancy and is shared with other primates. However, the neural computations underlying this ability remain largely unknown. Is the detection of social interactions a rapid perceptual process, or a slower post-perceptual inference? Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) decoding and computational modeling to ask whether social interactions can be detected via fast, feedforward processing. Subjects in the MEG viewed snapshots of visually matched real-world scenes containing a pair of people who were either engaged in a social interaction or acting independently. The presence versus absence of a social interaction could be read out from subjects MEG data spontaneously, even while subjects performed an orthogonal task. This readout generalized across different scenes, revealing abstract representations of social interactions in the human brain. These representations, however, did not come online until quite late, at 300 ms after image onset, well after the time period of feedforward visual processes. In a second experiment, we found that social interaction readout occurred at this same latency even when subjects performed an explicit task detecting social interactions. Consistent with these latency results, a standard feedforward deep neural network did not contain an abstract representation of social interactions at any model layer. We further showed that MEG responses distinguished between different types of social interactions (mutual gaze vs joint attention) even later, around 500 ms after image onset. Taken together, these results suggest that the human brain spontaneously extracts the presence and type of others social interactions, but does so slowly, likely relying on iterative top-down computations.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
27
FWCI
4.64
Field percentile
top 6%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDziura '20Masson '23Friedrich '22Moreau '23Miao '26Malik '26
74% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sarah Louise Dziura, James Chilton Thompson·Journal of Neuroscience·Oct 16, 2020· 9 citations