A model of depth-dependent responses from neural superposition in fly compound eyes
Cora HummertiD, Jouni TakaloiD, Vera VasasiD, Mikko JuusolaiD, Barbara WebbiD
Abstract
Fly compound eyes pool signals from photoreceptors that sample the same region of visual space through neural superposition in the lamina. The optical axes of photoreceptors projecting to a single lamina cartridge are not perfectly parallel, but instead converge at a point a few millimeters in front of the eye. At short viewing distances (1--10mm) this leads to distance-dependent differences in receptive field overlap. We explored whether it was possible that flies could sense depth in this "personal space" purely from the geometry of neural superposition. To this end, we combined a computational model of fly eye optics with a disparity-tuned lamina model originally developed for stereoscopic prey capture in praying mantises, and simulated the responses of lamina monopolar cells to moving stimuli at different distances. Across variations in stimulus parameters and lamina models, we found that lamina neuron responses indeed contain a distance-dependent component, which can overall be summarised as an enhanced response due to temporally overlapping receptor responses at a critical distance of 3--4mm, the convergence distance of photoreceptor axes. Depending on the lamina model and stimulus size, either response amplitude or onset gradient, or both, exhibited this peak. We further show that changes in eye size systematically shift this preferred distance, such that larger flies had a peak response at a greater distance. Our results demonstrate that lamina cell responses may contain a robust, geometry-derived component that is specific to object distance and invariant to other stimulus properties. This suggests that neural superposition, beyond improving sensitivity, may function analogously to a light-field camera system that is effectively "focused" on a behaviorally relevant distance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Motion-based depth estimation in Drosophila
Stefan Prech, Sophie Schmidt-Hamkens, … Juergen Haag·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026
- Hoverfly responses to looming stimuli depend on elevation and speed
Aika H. Young, Jaxon Mitchell, … Karin Nordström·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- Hypercomplex properties of Drosophila object detecting neurons
Mehmet F. Keleş, Mark Arthur Frye·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2017
- Visual circuitry for distance estimation in Drosophila
Joseph W. Shomar, Elizabeth Wu, … Damon A. Clark·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2024
- Binocular Mirror-Symmetric Microsaccadic Sampling Enables Drosophila Hyperacute 3D-Vision
Joni Kemppainen, Ben Scales, … Mikko Juusola·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2022
- The neuronal basis of insect stereopsis
Ronny Rosner, Joss von Hadeln, … Jenny C. A. Read·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2019