A spin glass representation of hierarchical gene regulation and the partial resolution of frustration
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks are directed and often contain loops. A loop can place competing demands on its genes, so that no expression state satisfies every regulatory interaction. In statistical physics such a conflict is called frustration. Existing spin-glass models of tissues assume symmetric regulation, and studies of frustration consider single cells. We develop a nonreciprocal multicellular Ising model that couples a directed regulatory network in each cell to random, symmetric signalling between neighbouring cells. We define intracellular and intercellular frustration densities, which count the unsatisfied interactions within a cell and with its neighbours. We study six exemplar nine-gene networks that share a downstream cascade and differ in an upstream three-gene motif. In isolated cells the motif sets the frustration. Negative feedback loops pass frustration around the loop, and their genes keep switching. The incoherent feedforward loop holds frustration at a single gene and freezes. When cells communicate, they form spatial clusters with shared expression profiles, and conflict between neighbours concentrates at cluster boundaries. Stronger coupling lowers intercellular frustration and raises intracellular frustration. Frustration is therefore resolved only in part: cells satisfy more of the couplings to their neighbours by satisfying fewer of their own regulatory interactions. Varying the coupling strength reveals a transition near the value at which the combined input of a cell's eight neighbours matches a single regulatory interaction. Below it, cells follow their own networks and the tissue fragments. Our framework links the structure of gene regulatory networks to the stability of gene expression in cells and tissues.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Minimal frustration underlies the usefulness of incomplete and inexact regulatory network models in biology
Shubham Tripathi, David A. Kessler, Herbert Levine·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2022
- Topological Constraints on Noise Propagation in Gene Regulatory Networks
Tarun Mahajan, Abhyudai Singh, Roy D. Dar·Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control ConferencePeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2022
- The relation between crosstalk and gene regulation form revisited
Rok Grah, Tamar Friedlander·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2020
- Regulatory stochasticity drives opposing phenotypic outcomes in cell-fate decision networks
Kishore Hari, Abhay Gupta, … Herbert Levine·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2026
- Emergent dynamics of cellular decision making in multi-node mutually repressive regulatory networks
Harshavardhan BV, Hanuma Sai Billakurthi, … Mohit Kumar Jolly·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2025
- Mutually inhibiting teams of nodes: A predictive framework for structure - dynamics relationships in gene regulatory networks
Sai Shyam, Nikhil Nandan, … Kishore Hari·Physical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2025