Rational inattention in mice

Behavior exhibited by humans and other organisms is generally inconsistent and biased, and thus is often labeled irrational. However, the origins of this seemingly suboptimal behavior remain elusive. We developed a behavioral task and normative framework to reveal how organisms should allocate their limited processing resources such that there is an advantage to being imprecise and biased for a given metabolic investment that guarantees maximal utility. We found that mice act as rational-inattentive agents by adaptively allocating their sensory resources in a way that maximizes reward consumption in novel stimulus-reward association environments. Surprisingly, perception to commonly occurring stimuli was relatively imprecise, however this apparent statistical fallacy implies "awareness" and efficient adaptation to their neurocognitive limitations. Interestingly, distributional reinforcement learning mechanisms efficiently regulate sensory precision via top-down normalization. These findings establish a neurobehavioral foundation for how organisms efficiently perceive and adapt to environmental states of the world within the constraints imposed by neurobiology.