Reliability of dynamic causal modelling of resting state magnetoencephalography
A. Jafarian, M. K. Assem, E. Ece Kocagoncu, J. H. Lanskey, R. Williams, Y.-J. Cheng, A. J. Quinn, J. Pitt, V. Raymont, S. Lowe, S. Lowe, K. D. Singh, M. W. Woolrich, A. C. Nobre, R. N. Henson, K. Friston, J. Rowe
Abstract
This study assesses the reliability of resting-state dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of magneto-electroencephalography under conductance-based canonical microcircuit models, in terms of both posterior parameter estimates and model evidence. We use resting state magneto-electroencephalography (MEG) data from two sessions, acquired two weeks apart, from a cohort with high between-subject variance arising from Alzheimers disease. Our focus is not on the effect of disease, but on the predictive validity of the methods implicit in their reliability, which is crucial for future studies of disease progression and drug intervention. To assess the predictive validity of first-level DCMs, we compare model evidence associated with the covariance among subject-specific free energies (i.e., the quality of the models) with vs. without interclass correlations. We then used parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) to investigate the predictive validity of DCM parameters at the between subject level. Specifically, we examined the evidence for or against parameter differences (i) within-subject, within-session, between-epochs; (ii) within-subject between-session and (iii) within-site between-subjects, accommodating the conditional dependency among parameter estimates. We show that for data acquired close in time, and under similar circumstances, more than 95% of inferred DCM parameters are unlikely to differ, speaking to mutual predictability over sessions. Using PEB, we show a reciprocal relationship between a conventional definition of reliability and the conditional dependency among inferred model parameters. Our analyses confirm the predictive validity and reliability of the conductance-based DCMs for resting-state neurophysiological data. In this respect, the implicit generative modelling is suitable for interventional and longitudinal studies of neurological and psychiatric disorders. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=147 SRC="FIGDIR/small/562379v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135c964org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@38e4a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12bc358org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@25f110_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variability and reliability of effective connectivity within the core default mode network: A longitudinal spectral DCM study
Hannes Almgren, Frederik Van de Steen, … Daniele Marinazzo·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2018
- Dynamic causal modelling of fluctuating connectivity in resting-state EEG
Frederik Van de Steen, Hannes Almgren, … Daniele Marinazzo·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2019
- Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling
Stefan Frässle, Klaas Enno Stephan·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2021
- Regression dynamic causal modeling for resting-state fMRI
Stefan Frässle, Samuel J. Harrison, … Klaas Enno Stephan·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2021
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model
Xiaojing Fang, Michael Marxen·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Predictive regression modeling with MEG/EEG: from source power to signals and cognitive states
David Sabbagh, Pierre Ablin, … Denis Alexander Engemann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020