Yearbook of pediatric endocrinologyGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and impact of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases in England: A study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation
Celine LewisiD, Emma BeechamiD, Felicity BoardmaniD, Gráinne BradyiD, James P. BuchananiD, Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir ClarkiD, Katie GilchristiD, Pia HardelidiD, Amy Hunter, Jennifer Jones, Kerry Leeson‐BeeversiD, Bethany Stafford‐Smith, Joachim TaniD, Cecilia Vindrola‐PadrosiD, Martin VuiD, Wing Han WuiD, Ania ZylbersztejniD, Melissa K. HilliD
Abstract
The role of genomics in healthcare is expanding rapidly and many countries are exploring the possibility of using genomic sequencing to expand current newborn screening programmes. Offering routine genomic newborn screening (gNBS) would allow newborn screening to include a much broader range of rare conditions, but there are many technical, practical, psychosocial, ethical and economic challenges to be addressed. Genomics England and NHS England have established the Generation Study to deliver gNBS for 100,000 births to explore the benefits, challenges, and practicalities of offering gNBS to parents in England. Here we describe the study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation, an independent mixed-methods evaluation of the Generation Study. The evaluation will have oversight from a Study Advisory Group that includes academic, clinical and patient representatives and a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) Advisory Group that includes members from parent and patient organisations and parents with relevant experiences. The Process and Impact Evaluation will examine whether offering gNBS in routine care is feasible and acceptable and inform our understanding of the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of gNBS in England. Through surveys and interviews conducted at two time points we will explore the attitudes and experiences of parents, professionals and patient organisations. We will also consider the clinical, psychosocial and health economic impacts, both positive and negative. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for peer review and publication.
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 28.02
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How parents judge newborn screening expansion in the genomic era: a theory-informed survey in France from the SeDeN-p3 study
Camille Level, Laurence Olivier Faivre, … Christine Peyron·medRxiv·Feb 24, 2026
- A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program
Elena Schnabel‐Besson, Nicola Dikow, … Eva Caroline Winkler·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2026
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study
Joanna Kaplanis, Dasha Deen, … Dalia Kasperavičiūtė·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- Selection of Genetic Conditions for Multi-State Genomic Newborn Screening in BEACONS-NBS
Nina B. Gold, Britt A. Johnson, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: Results of the NC NEXUS project
Tamara S. Roman, Stephanie B. Crowley, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Long-term Penetrance of Disease Variants in Genes Prioritized for Genomic Newborn Screening: Evidence from Adult Biobanks
Nina B. Gold, Hana Zouk, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Jun 12, 2026