medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Long-term Penetrance of Disease Variants in Genes Prioritized for Genomic Newborn Screening: Evidence from Adult Biobanks
Nina B. GoldiD, Hana ZoukiD, Julie YeoiD, Stuart R. LipsitziD, Satoshi KoyamaiD, Harini SomanchiiD, Emma F. PereziD, Margaret Sunitha SelvarajiD, Lauren O’GradyiD, Emily MilleriD, Anna C. F. LewisiD, Elizabeth W. KarlsoniD, Alanna StrongiD, Jessica I. GoldiD, Heidi L. RehmiD, Pradeep NatarajaniD, Robert C. GreeniD
Abstract
Structured abstractO_ST_ABSImportanceC_ST_ABSGenomic newborn screening (gNBS) is a potential public health intervention, but its positive predictive value (PPV) remains uncertain. Estimating the prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in genes prioritized for screening may clarify the long-term PPV and clinical utility of gNBS. ObjectiveTo compare ICD-based ascertainment, electronic medical record (EMR) review, and clinical assessment of genetic disorders in adults with P/LP variants in 54 genes prioritized for gNBS. DesignTwo-cohort observational study with EMR review and clinical assessment in the hospital-based cohort. SettingThe U.K. Biobank (UKB) and Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB). Participants451,877 adults from the UKB and 53,371 from the MGBB, all with exome sequencing data. ExposuresP/LP variants in 54 genes prioritized through expert consensus for gNBS, in genotypes consistent with each genes inheritance pattern. Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the absolute difference in the proportion of MGBB participants identified as affected by ICD versus EMR ascertainment. Secondary outcomes included findings from clinical assessments of undiagnosed MGBB participants, corrected UKB penetrance estimates, and extrapolation to U.S.. annual birth cohorts and living adults. ResultsP/LP variants were identified in 665 UKB participants (0.15%) and 82 MGBB participants (0.15%), approximately 1 in 650. In MGBB, EMR review revealed that 58/82 individuals (70.7%) were undiagnosed, although 25 of 58 (43.1%) had documented symptoms. Disease-associated ICD codes were found in 39.0% (32/82) of participants, whereas EMR review identified symptoms in 59.8% (49/82, McNemar P<.001). Applied to UKB, this correction yielded a penetrance of 28.4% (95% CI, 18.6% to 38.2%), implying that 73 to 203 participants beyond the 51 identified by ICD codes may have clinical features of disease. Extrapolated to U.S. birth cohorts, 4,900 to 5,700 newborns per year may harbor P/LP variants in these genes and survive into adulthood. Approximately 355,000 to 410,000 U.S. adults may have P/LP variants in these genes. Conclusions and relevancePenetrance of P/LP variants in genes prioritized for gNBS is substantially higher than ICD estimates suggest. Many adults with P/LP variants are symptomatic but undiagnosed, supporting inclusion of these genes in gNBS. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat proportion of adults with genomic variants linked to treatable genetic diseases develop symptoms and what does this imply for genomic newborn screening (gNBS)? FindingsAmong 505,222 adults, disease-associated variants in 54 gNBS genes were found in approximately 1 in 650 participants. In a hospital biobank cohort, only 29.3% of participants had been diagnosed, but electronic medical record review and targeted phenotyping identified symptoms in 59.8%. MeaningIndividuals with treatable genetic disorders that are identifiable through genomic screening are symptomatic but undiagnosed into adulthood, highlighting the importance of genomic newborn screening.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study
Joanna Kaplanis, Dasha Deen, … Dalia Kasperavičiūtė·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- Investigating penetrance of severe combined immunodeficiency variants in an adult population cohort: implications for genomic newborn screening
Imogen JH Grimwade, James Fasham, … Leigh M. Jackson·medRxiv·Feb 18, 2026
- Selection of Genetic Conditions for Multi-State Genomic Newborn Screening in BEACONS-NBS
Nina B. Gold, Britt A. Johnson, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: Results of the NC NEXUS project
Tamara S. Roman, Stephanie B. Crowley, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and impact of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases in England: A study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation
Celine Lewis, Emma Beecham, … Melissa K. Hill·Yearbook of pediatric endocrinologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2026
- A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program
Elena Schnabel‐Besson, Nicola Dikow, … Eva Caroline Winkler·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2026