A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program
Elena Schnabel‐BessoniD, Nicola DikowiD, Karla AlexiD, Ulrike MützeiD, Hannah Lilly StraubiD, Elena Sophia Doll, Julia MahaliD, Heiko BrennenstuhliD, Carlotta Julia MayeriD, Lars Neth, Tobias Hagedorn, Henriette HögliD, Sascha SettegastiD, Beate DitzeniD, Ralf Müller-Terpitz, Stefan KölkeriD, Christian Patrick SchaafiD, Eva Caroline WinkleriD
Abstract
PurposeNewborn screening (NBS) is an effective measure of secondary prevention. The application of genomic sequencing in population-based screening would enable further expansions of the NBS disease panel and a genomic NBS (gNBS). The selection of NBS target diseases is still based on the Wilson and Jungner screening criteria from 1968, which are considered incomplete, rendering the necessity of developing new criteria. MethodsThe present work aims to establish a multi-dimensional framework for future gNBS programs. An interdisciplinary expert panel comprising researchers from pediatric and adolescent medicine, human genetics, ethics, medical psychology, law, and patient representatives used a nominal group technique-like multi-stage consensus process to define criteria for gNBS, considering ethical, legal, and social implications, medical aspects, and patient perspectives. ResultsOverall, 18 criteria were developed, clustered into four subcategories: I. Clinical criteria (characteristics of the target disease); II. Diagnostic criteria (requirements of the test); III. Therapeutic-interventional criteria (prerequisites of the intervention); IV. Program management criteria (requirements of the program). Subcategories I-III define selection criteria for target diseases, subcategory IV defines criteria for how to establish and manage the program. ConclusionThis multi-dimensional framework serves as a well-balanced basis for developing thoroughly revised and internationally accepted consensus screening criteria.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and impact of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases in England: A study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation
Celine Lewis, Emma Beecham, … Melissa K. Hill·Yearbook of pediatric endocrinologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2026
- Selection of Genetic Conditions for Multi-State Genomic Newborn Screening in BEACONS-NBS
Nina B. Gold, Britt A. Johnson, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- How parents judge newborn screening expansion in the genomic era: a theory-informed survey in France from the SeDeN-p3 study
Camille Level, Laurence Olivier Faivre, … Christine Peyron·medRxiv·Feb 24, 2026
- Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: Results of the NC NEXUS project
Tamara S. Roman, Stephanie B. Crowley, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs
Thomas Minten, Sarah Bick, … Dominique C. Pichard·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 9, 2025
- Long-term Penetrance of Disease Variants in Genes Prioritized for Genomic Newborn Screening: Evidence from Adult Biobanks
Nina B. Gold, Hana Zouk, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Jun 12, 2026