Using Machine Learning to Identify True Somatic Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing
Chao WuiD, Xiaonan ZhaoiD, Mark Welsh, Kellianne Costello, Kajia Cao, Ahmad N. Abou TayouniD, Marilyn M. LiiD, Mahdi SarmadyiD
Abstract
BackgroundMolecular profiling has become essential for tumor risk stratification and treatment selection. However, cancer genome complexity and technical artifacts make identification of real variants a challenge. Currently, clinical laboratories rely on manual screening, which is costly, subjective, and not scalable. Here we present a machine learning-based method to distinguish artifacts from bona fide Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) detected by NGS from tumor specimens.\n\nMethodsA cohort of 11,278 SNVs identified through clinical sequencing of tumor specimens were collected and divided into training, validation, and test sets. Each SNV was manually inspected and labeled as either real or artifact as part of clinical laboratory workflow. A three-class (real, artifact and uncertain) model was developed on the training set, fine-tuned using the validation set, and then evaluated on the test set. Prediction intervals reflecting the certainty of the classifications were derived during the process to label \"uncertain\" variants.\n\nResultsThe optimized classifier demonstrated 100% specificity and 97% sensitivity over 5,587 SNVs of the test set. 1,252 out of 1,341 true positive variants were identified as real, 4,143 out of 4,246 false positive calls were deemed artifacts, while only 192(3.4%) SNVs were labeled as \"uncertain\" with zero misclassification between the true positives and artifacts in the test set.\n\nConclusionsWe presented a computational classifier to identify variant artifacts detected from tumor sequencing. Overall, 96.6% of the SNVs received a definitive label and thus were exempt from manual review. This framework could improve quality and efficiency of variant review process in clinical labs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Field percentile
- top 48%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Validation of genetic variants from NGS data using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Marc Vaisband, Maria Schubert, … Jan Hasenauer·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2023
- Azurify integrates cancer genomics with machine learning to classify the clinical significance of somatic variants
Ashkan Bigdeli, Darshan Shimoga Chandrashekar, … Robert B. Faryabi·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2025
- Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of tumor sequencing data
Erica Kay Barnell, Peter Ronning, … Obi L. Griffith·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 3, 2018
- Attentive deep learning-based tumor-only somatic mutation classifier achieves high accuracy agnostic of tissue type and capture kit.
Robert T. McLaughlin, Maansi Asthana, … David L. Masica·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2021
- Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Model Clinical Variant Reporting for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Oncology Assays
Kenneth Doig, Rashindrie D Perera, … Stephen B. Fox·BioData MiningPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2025
- FINDEL: A Deep Learning Approach To Efficient Artifact Removal From Cancer Genomes
Denis Tan, Pengfei Zhou, … Edwin Long·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2022