Sign in
BioinformaticsBioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

SVIM: Structural Variant Identification using Mapped Long Reads

David HelleriD, Martin VingroniD

Abstract

MotivationStructural variants are defined as genomic variants larger than 50bp. They have been shown to affect more bases in any given genome than SNPs or small indels. Additionally, they have great impact on human phenotype and diversity and have been linked to numerous diseases. Due to their size and association with repeats, they are difficult to detect by shotgun sequencing, especially when based on short reads. Long read, single molecule sequencing technologies like those offered by Pacific Biosciences or Oxford Nanopore Technologies produce reads with a length of several thousand base pairs. Despite the higher error rate and sequencing cost, long read sequencing offers many advantages for the detection of structural variants. Yet, available software tools still do not fully exploit the possibilities.\n\nResultsWe present SVIM, a tool for the sensitive detection and precise characterization of structural variants from long read data. SVIM consists of three components for the collection, clustering and combination of structural variant signatures from read alignments. It discriminates five different variant classes including similar types, such as tandem and interspersed duplications and novel element insertions. SVIM is unique in its capability of extracting both the genomic origin and destination of duplications. It compares favorably with existing tools in evaluations on simulated data and real datasets from PacBio and Nanopore sequencing machines.\n\nAvailability and implementationThe source code and executables of SVIM are available on Github: github.com/eldariont/svim. SVIM has been implemented in Python 3 and published on bioconda and the Python Package Index.\n\nContactheller_d@molgen.mpg.de

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSedlazeck '18Jiang '20Denti '22Lecompte '20Gaitán '23Zhao '17
78% semantic matchBioinformatics
Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck, Philipp Rescheneder, Moritz Smolka+4 more·Nature Methods·Apr 27, 2018· 1,663 citations