A delay in sampling information from temporally autocorrelated visual stimuli
Chloe Callahan- FlintoftiD, Alex O. HolcombeiD, Brad WybleiD
Abstract
Much of our world changes smoothly in time, yet the allocation of attention is typically studied with sudden changes - transients. When stimuli change gradually there is a sizeable lag between when a cue is presented and when an object is sampled (Carlson, Hogendoorn, & Verstraten, 2006; Sheth, Nijhawan & Shimojo, 2000). Yet this lag is not seen with rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stimuli where temporally uncorrelated stimuli are presented (Vul, Kanwisher & Nieuwenstein 2008; Goodbourn & Holcombe, 2015). These findings collectively suggest that temporal autocorrelation of a feature paradoxically increases the latency at which information is sampled. This hypothesis was tested by comparing stimuli changing smoothly in time (autocorrelated) to stimuli that change randomly. Participants attempted to report the color coincident with a visual cue. The result was a smaller selection lag for the randomly varying condition relative to the condition with a smooth color trajectory. Our third experiment finds that the increase in selection latency is due to the smoothness of the color change after the cue rather than extrapolated predictions based on the color changes presented before the cue. Together, these results support a theory of attentional drag, whereby attention remains engaged at a location longer when features are changing smoothly. A computational model provides insights into neural mechanisms that might underlie the effect.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Attention biases the appearance of rapidly alternating stimuli
Arsiak Ishaq, Erin Goddard·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- When to attend? Temporal attention interacts with expectation
Aysun Duyar, Shiyang Ren, Marisa Carrasco·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2023
- Slow change blindness from serial dependence
Haley G. Frey, David C. Whitney·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2025
- Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings
Nora Turoman, Ruxandra I. Tivadar, … Paweł J. Matusz·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2021
- Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
Matthew Davidson, David Alais, … Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2018
- Neural signatures of flexible temporal orienting under spatial and motor uncertainty
Yi Gao, Irene Echeverria-Altuna, … Anna Christina Nobre·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026