Lacuna: Cryptic Binding Pocket Discovery via Conformational Ensemble Analysis
Abstract
Lacuna, an open-source Python tool for discovering cryptic binding pockets: sites that are absent or too small to detect in a protein's unbound structure and open only during conformational fluctuation. Most binding-site predictors score a single static structure, which is precisely the structure in which a cryptic site is invisible. Lacuna instead generates a conformational ensemble from any input structure, detects pockets independently in every conformer, clusters the detections into persistent sites across the ensemble, and ranks those sites with a model fitted on within-structure pairs. Ensemble generation is pluggable: normal mode analysis by default, with implicit-solvent molecular dynamics, Boltz-2 diffusion sampling, or a user-supplied ensemble as alternatives. On the designated test fold of CryptoBench, Lacuna recovers 55.6% of cryptic sites in its top five predictions with the zero-dependency default and 66.1% with an optional PLM-assisted ranker; pooling the geometric detector with an optional learned surface detector recovers 73.9% while raising the fraction of sites found from 68.5% to 86.4%, measured on the held-out fold at five conformers. It recovers 73%, 45% and 87% on the PocketMiner set, a curated set of literature apo/holo pairs, and COACH420 respectively. The default backend completes in a median of 2.6 seconds per chain on one CPU core, so ensemble-based pocket finding does not require a simulation budget. Every site carries a continuous crypticity score, and outputs are emitted as docking-ready Boltz YAML constraints, AutoDock Vina boxes, pseudoatom PDB files, and the generated conformational ensemble as a multi-model PDB. Lacuna is MIT licensed and available at https://github.com/mooreneural/lacuna and on PyPI as lacuna-pockets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Kryptix-1: Conformational Ensemble Sampling Substantially Improves Cryptic Pocket Detection Relative to Static-Structure and Prior Computational Approaches
Ryan Varghese, Pooja Tiwary, Krishil Oswal·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Ability of a Structural World Model to Detect Cryptic Pockets from Apo Structure
Ryan Shihabi, Brent Vaughan, Sharief Taraman·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- The Influence of Ligands on AlphaFold3 Prediction of Cryptic Pockets
Maria Lazou, Felix Tuchscherer, … Diane Joseph‐McCarthy·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2026
- Cryptic binding sites are detected but not ranked: coverage, conversion, and the limits of detector consensus
Clayton W. Moore·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- CryptoBank: A Resource for the Identification and Prediction of Cryptic Sites in Proteins
Pedro Febrer Martinez, Thorben Fröhlking, … Francesco Luigi Gervasio·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- SIMORGH: Ensemble-Aware Geometric Deep Learning for Apo-State and Cryptic Ligand Binding Site Prediction
Omid Mokhtari, Amirhossein Naghsh Nilchi, … Hamed Khakzad·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026