bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Strategies used by two memories to share space in a common neural network
Abstract
How distinct memories are encoded into the same network space without destructive interference is not well-understood. Here, we utilized Tritonia diomedeas escape swim network to explore how two sequentially acquired forms of non-associative learning, sensitization and habituation, are encoded into the same network. Behavioral experiments showed them to alter non-identical sets of behavioral features, suggesting they utilize somewhat independent sites of plasticity within the network. Large-scale voltage-sensitive dye recordings revealed two findings. First, both forms of learning, which occur sequentially in the 10-trial training protocol used, act to produce a change in the number of pedal neurons firing during the dorsal phase of the motor program, with sensitization producing an increase, and habituation a decrease in their number. The number of neurons participating in the ventral phase was unaffected. Second, sensitization produced an enhancement of burst intensity specific to the ventral phase neurons, while habituation was associated with a decrease in burst intensity in both phases. Using injected current pulses, intracellular recordings revealed that sensitization acted to increase the excitability of neurons firing in both phases, whereas habituation only acted to reduce excitability in ventral phase neurons. These excitability changes were associated with different mechanisms - reduced spike frequency accommodation in the ventral phase neurons, and depolarization of the resting potential in the dorsal phase neurons. These findings of partially different storage sites and mechanisms for two different non-associative memories illuminate a potential network strategy for minimizing destructive interference when storing multiple memories into the same network.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A dynamic attractor network model of memory formation, reinforcement and forgetting
Marta Boscaglia, Chiara Gastaldi, … Rodrigo Quian Quiroga·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2023
- Hippocampal neuronal synchronization in the rat - Dissociation of perception and associative learning.
Kayeon Kim, Miriam S. Nokia, … Satu Palva·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Principles for coding associative memories in a compact neural network
Christian Oliver Pritz, Eyal Itskovits, … Alon Zaslaver·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2023
- Intrinsic neural excitability induces time-dependent overlap of memory engrams
G. Delamare, D. Feitosa Tome, C. Clopath·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2022
- Contributions of hippocampus and striatum to memory-guided behavior depend on past experience
Janina D Ferbinteanu·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2016
- An Emergent Neural Coactivity Code for Dynamic Memory
Mohamady El-Gaby, Hayley M. Reeve, … David Dupret·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2021