Folding the unfoldable 2: using AlphaFold and ESMFold to explore spurious proteins
Abstract
MotivationSpurious protein sequences, resulting from gene prediction errors, theoretically should not yield folded structures. AlphaFold2 was previously shown to predict short spurious sequences with high pLDDT scores and was therefore unlikely to distinguish between real proteins and spurious proteins which are usually short. We evaluate whether newer structure prediction methods (ESMFold and AlphaFold3) similarly predict short sequences with high pLDDT or if they better discriminate between spurious and real proteins. ResultsAll three structure prediction methods (ESMFold, AlphaFold2, and AlphaFold3) predict short spurious sequences from AntiFam with unexpectedly high pLDDT scores, however the discrimination between spurious and real proteins improves beyond 100 amino acids. By analysing sequences with disparate pTM and pLDDT scores, we identified two likely spurious shadow ORFs in Swiss-Prot and one potentially non-spurious AntiFam entry. Using the structure prediction scores, we developed a Gaussian Process Model and evaluated its performance on AlphaFold DB, identifying potential spurious proteins at scale. While limited on its own, this model can increase confidence in spurious protein identification when combined with other methods. AvailabilityStructure predictions are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18390113. Model implementation and figure generation code are available at https://github.com/0rra/fold_unfold2.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Balancing Speed and Precision in Protein Folding: A Comparison of AlphaFold2, ESMFold, and OmegaFold
Anna Hýsková, Eva Marsalkova, Petr Šimeček·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2026
- Random, de novo and conserved proteins: How structure and disorder predictors perform differently
Lasse Middendorf, Lars A. Eicholt·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2023
- Testing the reliability of AI-generated protein structures
Amanda Xu, Steven L. Salzberg·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2026
- AlphaFold2: A role for disordered protein prediction?
Carter J. Wilson, Wing‐Yiu Choy, Mikko Karttunen·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2022
- A discrete protein subset drives structure prediction discordance in orphan proteins
Lars A. Eicholt, Lasse Middendorf·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026
- Fold or flop: quality assessment of AlphaFold predictions on whole proteomes
Edoardo Sarti, Frédéric Cazals·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026