bioRxivEcology
Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
S. Mulero, E. Toulza, A. Loisier, M. Zimmerman, J.-F. Allienne, J. Foata, Y. Quilichini, J.-P. Pointier, O. Rey, J. Boissier
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWTo assess the effect of anthropogenic activities on ecosystems, it is of prime importance to develop new tools enabling a rapid characterisation of ecological communities. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly impacted and threatened by human activities and need thorough attention to preserve their biodiversity and the ecological services they provide. Studying such ecosystems is generally difficult because the associated organisms are hard to sample and to monitor. We present a ready to use environmental metabarcoding diagnostic tool to characterise and monitor the freshwater malacofauna from water samples. The efficiency of this new tool was compared to a classical malacological survey at 19 sampled sites from 10 distinct rivers distributed over Corsica Island (France). Our eDNA monitoring tool demonstrated a remarkable ability to reconstitute the local malacofauna compared to the malacological survey, with 97.1% of species detection confirmed by both methods. The present tool successfully detected the 11 freshwater snail species previously reported in Corsica by malacological survey but was limited at the genus level for some species. Moreover, our malacological survey allowed an update of the local distribution of a wide diversity of freshwater snails including invasive species (i.e. Potamopyrgus antipodarum and Physa acuta) as well as snail hosts of pathogens of medical and veterinary importance (i.e. Bulinus truncatus and Galba truncatula).
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water
Luke E. Holman, Mark de Bruyn, … Marc Rius·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2019
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys extend the range of invasion for non-indigenous freshwater species in Eastern Europe.
G.-J. Jeunen, T. Lipinskaya, … N. Gemmell·bioRxiv·May 16, 2021
- How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity
O. Tournayre, H. Tian, … S. C. Lougheed·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology
Manuel Curto, Sofia Batista, … Hugo F. Gante·Environmental ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2025
- eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine-scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
Rebecca R. Gehri, Wesley A. Larson, … Yue Shi·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2021
- Variable performances of commercial eDNA inventories challenge their use for surveying stream fish communities
Jean‐Marc Roussel, Erwan Quéméré, … Hadrien Lalagüe·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026