Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems Through Matched Stimulus Representations
Srikanth R. DameraiD, Patrick S. MaloneiD, Benson W. StevensiD, Richard Klein, Silvio P. EberhardtiD, Edward T. AueriD, Lynne E. BernsteiniD, Maximilian RiesenhuberiD
Abstract
It has been postulated that the brain is organized by "metamodal", sensory-independent cortical modules implementing particular computations, leading to the intriguing hypothesis that brain areas can perform tasks (such as word recognition) not just in "standard" sensory modalities but also in novel sensory modalities. Yet, evidence for this theory, especially in neurotypical subjects, has been variable. We hypothesized that effective metamodal engagement of a brain area requires congruence between the novel and standard sensory modalities not only at the task level (e.g., "word recognition") but critically also a match at the algorithmic level (in Marrs terminology), i.e., at the level of neural representation of the information of interest. To test this hypothesis, we trained participants to recognize vibrotactile versions of auditory words using two encoding schemes. The vocoded approach preserved the dynamics and representational similarities of auditory speech while the token-based approach used an abstract phoneme-based code. Although both groups learned the vibrotactile word recognition task, only in the vocoded group did trained vibrotactile stimuli recruit the auditory speech network and lead to increased coupling between somatosensory and auditory speech areas. In contrast, the token-based encoding appeared to rely on paired-associate learning. Thus, matching neural input representations is a critical factor for assessing and leveraging the metamodal potential of cortical modules.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Field percentile
- top 28%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural basis of learning to perceive speech through touch using an acoustic-to-vibrotactile speech sensory substitution
Patrick S. Malone, Silvio P. Eberhardt, … Maximilian Riesenhuber·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2021
- The neural computations for stimulus presence and modal identity diverge along a shared circuit
David A. Tovar, Jean‐Paul Noel, … Mark T. Wallace·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2020
- Hierarchical unimodal processing within the primary somatosensory cortex during a bimodal detection task
Sergio Parra, Héctor Díaz, … Román Rossi-Pool·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2022
- Phonological representations of auditory and visual speech in the occipito-temporal cortex and beyond
Alice Van Audenhaege, Stefania Mattioni, … Olivier Collignon·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2025
- Neuronal basis of audio-tactile speech perception
Katarzyna Cieśla, Tomasz P. Wolak, Amir Amedi·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2024
- Can you feel what I am saying? Speech-based vibrotactile stimulation enhances the cortical tracking of attended speech in a multi-talker background
Ioana-Sabina Rautu, Mathieu Bourguignon, … Xavier De Tiège·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026