Biomechanical simplification of the motor control of whisking
Chris S. BreseeiD, Yifu LuoiD, Jasmine L. Alade’Fa, Megan E. Black, Kevin J. Kleczka, Nicholas Edward BushiD, Kevin Zhang, Mitra J. Z. HartmanniD
Abstract
1.Animal nervous systems must coordinate the sequence and timing of numerous muscles - a challenging control problem. The challenge is particularly acute for highly mobile sensing structures with many degrees of freedom, such as eyes, pinnae, hands, forepaws, and whiskers, because these low-mass, distal sensors require complex muscle coordination. This work examines how the geometry of the rat whisker array simplifies coordination required for "whisking" behavior 1-3. During whisking, 33 intrinsic ("sling") muscles are the primary drivers 4-12 of the rapid, rhythmic protractions of the large mystacial vibrissae (whiskers), which vary more than sixfold in length and threefold in base diameter 13-16. Although whisking is a rhythmic, centrally-patterned behavior 17-24, rodents can change the position, shape, and size of the whisker array, indicating considerable voluntary control 25-34. To begin quantifying how the arrays biomechanics contribute to whisking movements, we used three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions of follicle and sling muscle geometry to simulate the movement resulting from a "uniform motor command," defined as equal firing rates across all sling muscle motor neurons. This simulation provides a baseline profile of protraction under anatomically realistic but uniformly driven conditions. It does not isolate neural from biomechanical contributions but helps identify deviations that suggest active control. Simulations reveal that all follicles rotate through approximately equal angles, regardless of size. The angular fanning of the whiskers at their bases increases monotonically throughout protraction, while maximum distance between whisker tips occurs at approximately 90% of resting muscle length, after which whisker tips converge and sensing resolution increases monotonically.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Constraints on the deformation of the vibrissa within the follicle
Yifu Luo, Chris S. Bresee, … Mitra J. Z. Hartmann·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Predictive whisker kinematics reveal context-dependent sensorimotor strategies
Avner Wallach, David S. Deutsch, … Ehud Ahissar·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2020
- WHISKiT Physics: A three-dimensional mechanical model of the rat vibrissal array
Nadina O. Zweifel, Nicholas Edward Bush, … Mitra J.Z. Hartmann·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2019
- Orofacial movements: Individuality and stereotypy when mice move a single whisker to touch
Marcel Staab, Keisuke Sehara, … Robert N. S. Sachdev·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2025
- Three-dimensional contact point determination and contour reconstruction during active whisking behavior of the awake rat
Lucie A. Huet, Hannah M. Emnett, Mitra J. Z. Hartmann·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2020
- Predicting behavior from eye movement and whisking asymmetry
Ronny Bergmann, Keisuke Sehara, … Robert N. S. Sachdev·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022