bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Expectation Shapes Neural Preparation for AI-generated and Real Image Processing: Evidence from EEG
Yonghao CheniD, Anna EiserbeckiD, Martin MaieriD, Felix KlotzscheiD, S. HofmanniD, Julia BaumiD, Birgit NierulaiD, Anna HilsmanniD, Sebastian BosseiD, Arno VillringeriD, Rasha Abdel RahmaniD, Michael GaebleriD, Vadim NikuliniD
Abstract
AbstractAI-generated images, videos, and news have become an inseparable part of daily life, leading to increasing skepticism toward online information. Understanding how expectations about the presence of AI-generated content influence perception is crucial for elucidating the underlying neural mechanisms and facilitating the generation of naturalistic avatars. In this study, we analyzed an existing EEG dataset (N = 29) in which participants viewed emotional facial photographs of only real individuals while being informed that upcoming faces were either real ("REAL") or AI-generated ("FAKE"). We examined pre-stimulus oscillatory activities in the one-second EEG interval before stimulus onset and found significantly lower alpha power when participants expected "FAKE" compared to "REAL" faces. This effect was region-specific, particularly in right occipito-parietal and temporo-parietal regions, as identified by both sensor- and source- level analyses. In addition, the modulation effect between pre-stimulus alpha activity and post-stimulus event-related potentials (ERPs) was measured. A significant correlation between changes in late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes and pre-stimulus alpha power was observed exclusively for "FAKE" smiling faces, consistent with our previous findings. These results suggest that AI-related expectations modulate neural preparatory states, with lower alpha activity presumably reflecting increased attentional demands for stimuli believed to be artificially generated. This study demonstrates that top-down beliefs systematically shape both pre- and post-stimulus neural dynamics, providing new insights into how cognitive expectations bias perceptual processing, with implications for understanding human-AI interaction and improving the design and evaluation of AI- generated content in real-world contexts.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Emotional Responses to Naturalistic and AI-generated Affective Pictures: A Systematic Comparison
Faith E. Gilbert, Fan Yang, … Andreas Keil·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2025
- Behavioral and neural evidence for the underestimated attractiveness of faces synthesized using an artificial neural network
S. Nishida·Computers in Human Behavior Artificial HumansPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2024
- The role of attention in the generation of anticipatory potentials to affective stimuli: an ERP and source analysis study
Ester Benzaquén, Timothy David Griffiths, Sukhbinder Kumar·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- A neuro-computational approximation of the qualities of mental images
Rico Stecher, DANIEL H. KAISER·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Real-world expectations and their affective value modulate object processing
Laurent Caplette, Frédéric Gosselin, … Bruno Wicker·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2020
- Attention, Emotion, and Authenticity: Eye-Tracking Evidence from AI vs. Human Visual Design
Murat Aytaş, Kamil Kerem Yıldırım, … Esma Nur Cerinan Otovic·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025