Peer Community JournalNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Enhancing Statistical Power While Maintaining Small Sample Sizes in Behavioral Neuroscience Experiments Evaluating Success Rates
Theo Desachy, Marc ThévenetiD, Samuel GarciaiD, Anistasha LightningiD, Anne DidieriD, Nathalie MandaironiD, Nicola KuczewskiiD
Abstract
Studies with low statistical power reduce the probability of detecting true effects and often lead to overestimated effect sizes, undermining the reproducibility of scientific results. While several free statistical software tools are available for calculating statistical power, they often do not account for the specialized aspects of experimental designs in behavioral studies that evaluate success rates. To address this gap, we developed "SuccessRatePower" a free and user-friendly power calculator based on Monte Carlo simulations that takes into account the particular parameters of these experimental designs. Using "SuccessRatePower", we demonstrated that statistical power can be increased by modifying the experimental protocol in three ways: 1) reducing the probability of succeeding by chance (chance level), 2) increasing the number of trials used to calculate subject success rates, and, in some circumstance, 3) employing statistical analyses suited for discrete values. These adjustments enable even studies with small sample sizes to achieve high statistical power. Finally, we performed an associative behavioral task in mice, confirming the simulated statistical advantages of reducing chance levels and increasing the number of trials in such studies
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - a systematic review
Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Thiago C. Moulin, … Olavo B. Amaral·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2018
- A systematic review of sample size and power in leading neuroscience journals
Alice Carter, Kate Tilling, Marcus R Munafò·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2017
- The statistical power of three monkeys
Jean Laurens·bioRxiv·May 10, 2022
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Denes Szucs, John PA Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2016
- Hypothesis-testing Improves the Predicted Reliability of Neuroscience Research
Bradley E. Alger·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2019
- Statistical power and false positive rates for interdependent outcomes are strongly influenced by test type: Implications for behavioral neuroscience
Michelle A. Frankot, Peyton M. Mueller, … Cole Vonder Haar·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2023