bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Preserved implicit metacognitive sensitivity distinguishes psychosis risk from first-episode psychosis: A cross-sectional virtual reality-based study
Yonatan SterniD, Donia Sussan, Barnaby NelsoniD, Uri HertziD, Morris Goldsmith, Eyal BergmanniD, Lauren NashashibiiD, Roy SalomoniD, Danny KoreniD
Abstract
Relatively preserved insight distinguishes individuals at risk for psychosis from those with full-blown psychosis. Metacognitive processes thought to support insight and uncertainty monitoring may therefore serve as early markers of illness progression. Yet findings have been inconsistent, perhaps partly due to reliance on explicit confidence ratings that introduce reflection and response biases. To address these limitations, we used a novel implicit confidence measure derived from post-decision gaze in a virtual-reality probabilistic learning task. Gaze-based confidence quantifies the alignment between spatial predictions and gaze direction. We assessed first-order learning and gaze-based metacognition in four groups: clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P), first episode psychosis (FEP), help-seeking controls (HSC), and healthy controls (HC). We tested whether implicit metacognition differentiates psychosis risk from psychosis. Learning accuracy was reduced in both CHR-P and FEP compared to control groups. At the metacognitive level, CHR-P confidence levels were approximately commensurate with their reduced first-order performance, indicating preserved confidence calibration, along with preserved metacognitive sensitivity--the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect decisions. In contrast, FEP showed impaired confidence calibration and reduced metacognitive sensitivity. Metacognitive calibration and sensitivity distinguished CHR-P from FEP and provided predictive value in distinguishing CHR-P from FEP, whereas learning accuracy did not. These findings reveal a dissociation between first-order cognitive processes and distinct aspects of implicit metacognition, including confidence calibration and metacognitive sensitivity, across the psychosis continuum. This dissociation may refine early clinical characterization and improve identification of preserved insight-related mechanisms in psychosis risk.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Influence of prior beliefs on perception in early psychosis: effects of illness stage and hierarchical level of belief
Joost Haarsma, Franziska Knolle, … Graham K. Murray·Journal of Abnormal PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Predictive inference alterations in psychosis proneness are context-dependent
Luca Tarasi, Vincenzo Romei·bioRxiv·May 17, 2025
- Atypical processing of uncertainty in individuals at risk for psychosis
David M. Cole, Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu, … Klaas Enno Stephan·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Overly strong priors for socially meaningful visual signals in psychosis proneness
Heiner Stuke, Elisabeth Kress, … Katharina Schmack·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2018
- Enhanced instructed fear learning in delusion-proneness
P. Petrovic, A. Louzolo, … A. Olsson·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2018
- Sensory learning and inference is impaired in the non-clinical continuum of psychosis: a replication study
Ilvana Dzafic, Roshini Randeniya, … Marta Isabel Garrido·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2020