Construction, validation and application of nocturnal pollen transport networks in an agro-ecosystem: a comparison using microscopy and DNA metabarcoding
C. J. Macgregor, J. J. Kitson, R. Fox, C. Hahn, D. H. Lunt, M. J. Pocock, D. M. Evans
Abstract
O_LIMoths are globally relevant as pollinators but nocturnal pollination remains poorly understood. Plant-pollinator interaction networks are traditionally constructed using either flower-visitor observations or pollen-transport detection using microscopy. Recent studies have shown the potential of DNA metabarcoding for detecting and identifying pollen-transport interactions. However, no study has directly compared the realised observations of pollen-transport networks between DNA metabarcoding and conventional light microscopy.\nC_LIO_LIUsing matched samples of nocturnal moths, we construct pollen-transport networks using two methods: light microscopy and DNA metabarcoding. Focussing on the feeding mouthparts of moths, we develop and provide reproducible methods for merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to better understand species-interactions.\nC_LIO_LIDNA metabarcoding detected pollen on more individual moths, and detected multiple pollen types on more individuals than microscopy, but the average number of pollen types per individual was unchanged. However, after aggregating individuals of each species, metabarcoding detected more interactions per moth species. Pollen-transport network metrics differed between methods, because of variation in the ability of each to detect multiple pollen types per moth and to separate morphologically-similar or related pollen. We detected unexpected but plausible moth-plant interactions with metabarcoding, revealing new detail about nocturnal pollination systems.\nC_LIO_LIThe nocturnal pollination networks observed using metabarcoding and microscopy were similar, yet distinct, with implications for network ecologists. Comparisons between networks constructed using metabarcoding and traditional methods should therefore be treated with caution. Nevertheless, the potential applications of metabarcoding for studying plant-pollinator interaction networks are encouraging, especially when investigating understudied pollinators such as moths.\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient Multiplexing of Pollinator Metabarcodes Using Oxford Nanopore MinION Sequencing: Insights for Meadow Management from Floral Environmental DNA
Stephen E. Harris, Amelia Whitehurst, … Christopher M. Nagy·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2023
- The non-random assembly of functional motifs in plant-pollinator networks
J. B. Lanuza, A. Allen-Perkins, I. Bartomeus·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2022
- Do nocturnal pollinators carry a more conspecific pollen load than diurnal ones?
Mialy Razanajatovo, Frank M. Schurr, … Eva Knop·Basic and Applied EcologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2024
- BeeDNA: microfluidic environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for connecting plant and pollinator communities
L. R. Harper, M. L. Niemiller, … M. A. Davis·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2021
- Honey bee pollen foraging ecology across an urbanization gradient
R. T. Richardson, T. D. Eaton, … D. B. Sponsler·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2019
- Efficient assessment of nocturnal flying insect communities by combining automatic light traps and DNA metabarcoding
Vanessa A. Mata, Sónia Ferreira, … Pedro Rui Beja·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2020