bioRxivPharmacology & Toxicology
Chronic high glyphosate exposure delays individual worker bee (Apis mellifera L.) development under field conditions
Richard Odemer, Abdulrahim T. Alkassab, Gabriela Bischoff, Malte Frommberger, Anna Wernecke, Ina Patrizia Wirtz, Jens Pistorius, Franziska Odemer
Abstract
The ongoing debate about glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) and their implications for beneficial arthropods give rise to controversy. This research was carried out to cover possible sublethal GBH effects on brood and colony development, adult survival, and overwintering success of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) under field conditions. Residues in bee relevant matrices such as nectar, pollen and plants were measured in addition. To address these questions, we adopted four independent study approaches. For brood effects and survival, we orally exposed mini-hives housed in the "Kieler mating-nuc" system to sublethal concentrations of 4.8 mg glyphosate/kg (T1, low) and 137.6 mg glyphosate/kg (T2, high) over the period of one brood cycle (21 days). Brood development and colony conditions were assessed after a modified OECD method (No. 75). For adult survival, we weighed and labeled freshly emerged workers from exposed colonies and introduced them into non-contaminated mini-hives to monitor life span for 25 consecutive days. Results from these experiments showed a trivial effect of GBH on colony conditions and survival of individual workers, even though hatching weight was reduced in T2. The brood termination rate (BTR) in the T2 treatment, however, was more than doubled (49.84%) when compared to the control (22.11%) or T1 (20.69%). This was surprising as T2 colonies gained similar weight and similar numbers of bees per colony compared to the control, indicating equal performance. Obviously, the brood development in T2 was not "terminated" as expected by the OECD method terminology but rather "slowed down" for an unknown period of time. In light of these findings, we suggest that chronic high GBH exposure is capable of delaying worker brood development to a significant extent while no further detrimental effects seem to appear at the colony level. Against this background, we discuss additional results and possible consequences of GBH for honey bee health.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Parental effects via glyphosate-based herbicides in a bird model?
S. Ruuskanen, M. Rainio, … M. Helander·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2019
- Pollen contaminated with field-relevant levels of cyhalothrin affects honey bee survival, nutritional physiology, and pollen consumption behavior
Adam G Dolezal, Jimena Carrillo-Tripp, … Amy L Toth·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2015
- Social Disruption: Sublethal pesticides in pollen lead to Apis mellifera queen events and brood loss
K. S. Traynor, Z. S. Lamas, D. vanEngelsdorp·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- Occasional and constant exposure to dietary ethanol shortens the lifespan of worker honey bees
Monika Ostap‐Chęć, Daniel Bajorek, … Krzysztof Miler·Journal of Comparative Physiology BPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2024
- Systemic pesticides in a solitary bee pollen food store affect larval development and increase pupal mortality
N. T. Phan, N. K. Joshi, … D. J. Biddinger·bioRxiv·May 12, 2022
- Imidacloprid disrupts larval molting regulation and nutrient energy metabolism, causing developmental delay in honey bee Apis mellifera