Contrast Thresholds Reveal Different Visual Masking Functions In Humans And Praying Mantises
Ghaith TarawnehiD, Vivek NityanandaiD, Ronny RosneriD, Steven P. ErringtoniD, William Herbert, Sandra Arranz-ParaísoiD, Natalie Busby, Jimmy Tampin, Jenny C. A. ReadiD, Ignacio Serrano‐PedrazaiD
Abstract
Recently, we showed a novel property of the Hassenstein-Reichardt detector: namely, that insect motion detection can be masked by \"invisible\" noise, i.e. visual noise presented at spatial frequencies to which the animals do not respond when presented as a signal. While this study compared the effect of noise on human and insect motion perception, it used different ways of quantifying masking in two species. This was because the human studies measured contrast thresholds, which were too time-consuming to acquire in the insect given the large number of stimulus parameters examined. Here, we run longer experiments in which we obtained contrast thresholds at just two signal and two noise frequencies. We examine the increase in threshold produced by noise at either the same frequency as the signal, or a different frequency. We do this in both humans and praying mantises (Sphodromantis lineola), enabling us to compare these species directly in the same paradigm. Our results confirm our earlier finding: whereas in humans, visual noise masks much more effectively when presented at the signal spatial frequency, in insects, noise is roughly equivalently effective whether presented at the same frequency or a lower frequency. In both species, visual noise presented at a higher spatial frequency is a less effective mask.\n\nSummary StatementWe here show that despite having similar motion detection systems, insects and humans differ in the effect of low and high spatial frequency noise on their contrast thresholds.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Field percentile
- 47th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Invisible noise obscures visible signal in insect motion detection
Ghaith Tarawneh, Vivek Nityananda, … Ignacio Serrano‐Pedraza·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2017
- Target tracking behaviour of the praying mantis Sphrodromantis lineola (Linnaeus) is driven by looming-type motion-detectors.
F. C. Rind, L. N. Jones, … J. Read·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2020
- Apparent Motion Perception in the Praying Mantis: Psychophysics and Modelling
Ghaith Tarawneh, Lisa Jones, … Jenny C. A. Read·VisionPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2018
- Background matching can reduce responsiveness of jumping spiders to stimuli in motion
- Motion-in-depth perception and prey capture in the praying mantis
V. Nityananda, C. Joubier, … J. C. A. Read·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2018
- Human noise blindness drives suboptimal cognitive inference
Santiago Herce Castañón, Rani Moran, … Christopher Summerfield·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2019